I would get in contact with kings performance as they have a few 1000hp s2000 in there stable.

 

I think a 500whp Evans car will say more than a 1000whp Kings car in this case.

 

Found this, probably a big hp car but nice:

"Finally i had a chance to test the intake and here its what i saw right of the bat.

1- the engine mid range and throttle response saw huge improvements (talking bout 1500rpm quicker spool Vs The BMC i had before)

2-Power Band its way bigger and hold it past 10500rpm

3- got 78hp peak power gain atof the spring and at full boost close to 160hp gain on mid range and 82 hp peak gain.. i tested at the track but couldnt get a full hit...so far im up 5mph at the 1/8 (from 131 to 136) so we are happy with it."

 

^^ So who was that??

 

Some B engine maniac, not about the F.

 

Ehhh...Need an S2000 motor to be dynoed.

 

Ehhh...Need an S2000 motor to be dynoed.
[/quote]

Oh yeah, agree.

 

Agree'd

Kings uses FBM stuff.

 

Who cares what the thing does on a flow bench, or cfm's or any of that shit. People care about REAL WORLD results.

If you can trap the same MPH and run the same times with a $800 hand ported head vs a $4500 CNC'd head with a whole bunch of numbers thrown around what are you going to pick? if it has no real world results why are you going to spend the money?


I'm sure this thing will make some badass power increases. But i bet you're going to lose some hp and torque under 5-6000 rpms. If you're not running a 64mm+ turbo and making over 600-700hp this probably isnt the piece for you.


the second most important thing is to use a shop that has nothing to gain and nothing to lose from testing a product for their customers.

 

An engine is in effect an air pump, its about getting air in, and out. Look up CFM and you will see why this real world result is so important.