S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

BRP "Hotside" Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 05:55 AM
  #351  
bripab007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nickolas,Mar 14 2006, 02:39 AM
The torque and hp diagram give you the same information. Comparing the area below the hp curve is the same as comparing the area under the torque curve (reason: hp is torque*rpm AND you have rpm for the "X" axis on both diagrams)
No, area under the torque curve is what you want to look at because:

Originally Posted by RED MX5
I agree that the averaging method you used yields the approximate area under the power curve, but think about that for a minute. HP is calculated based on torque and revs, and when you average HP over a range of revs you are integrating with revs a second time.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 06:21 AM
  #352  
PilotKD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,432
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Default

Can't wait for this thing to be released. I think we're getting bored.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #353  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

RedMx5, thanks for the additional info. A few of my previous arguments are flawed...

From what I now understand, torque curves show what the forces the engine can produce over the engine's operating range. The horsepower curves show how that torque is effectively put to the wheels due to gearing.

I still have a hard time believing that an engine with a constant 200 lb-ft of torque from idle to redline will push you into your seat with the same force at all engine speeds. Maybe I'm stubborn
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #354  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by PilotKD,Mar 14 2006, 10:21 AM
Can't wait for this thing to be released. I think we're getting bored.
I love this stuff. I compiled all that data just to have more to look at. I check this thread like ten times a day just to see if there are any new developments
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #355  
azrael's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201
From what I now understand, torque curves show what the forces the engine can produce over the engine's operating range. The horsepower curves show how that torque is effectively put to the wheels due to gearing.
Very close, but no cigar. The horsepower curve shows how torque is integrated over time (RPM). Basically, torque shows how much power the engine makes at a given RPM. It's directly related to the volumetric efficiency of the engine as a whole (from intake filter to exhaust pipe outlet). However, at high RPM, that torque is being applied more often, as the number of power strokes per unit time has increased. As such, even a low torque engine (like the F2xC we know and love) can be peppy and powerful at high RPM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #356  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

For you torque lovers.

Pre VTEC

Lovefab [$8,000] ~ 60.3 ft-lb average @ $132.7 per ft-lb

Comptech [$4,000] ~ 15.3 ft-lb average @ $261 per ft-lb

BRP [$6,500] ~ 87.8 ft-lb average @ $74 per ft-lb


Post VTEC

Lovefab [$8,000] ~ 88.8 ft-lb average @ $90.1 per ft-lb

Comptech [$4,000] ~ 40.4 ft-lb average @ $99.0 per ft-lb

BRP [@6,500] ~ 88.4 ft-lb average @ $73.5 per ft-lb
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #357  
stitos2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: NJ shore
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Mar 14 2006, 01:42 PM
For you torque lovers.

Pre VTEC

Lovefab [$8,000] ~ 60.3 ft-lb average @ $132.7 per ft-lb

Comptech [$4,000] ~ 15.3 ft-lb average @ $261 per ft-lb

BRP [$6,500] ~ 87.8 ft-lb average @ $74 per ft-lb


Post VTEC

Lovefab [$8,000] ~ 88.8 ft-lb average @ $90.1 per ft-lb

Comptech [$4,000] ~ 40.4 ft-lb average @ $99.0 per ft-lb

BRP [@6,500] ~ 88.4 ft-lb average @ $73.5 per ft-lb
C.A.R.B certified = Priceless

There's some things you can't buy, and some cops you can't bribe ... For everything else there's Comptech
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:04 AM
  #358  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by stitos2k,Mar 14 2006, 12:47 PM
C.A.R.B certified = Priceless

There's some things you can't buy, and some cops you can't bribe ... For everything else there's Comptech
Good stuff

In central Virginia, a C.A.R.B. means nothing more than what you look out for on the Atkins diet.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #359  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Mar 14 2006, 01:04 PM
Good stuff

In central Virginia, a C.A.R.B. means nothing more than what you look out for on the Atkins diet.
hahahaha, good stuff, i'll be lookin at the longterm of the first 10 people that buy and install this to see how it holds up over the year of a average joe beating. i personally love this solution, power everywhere, damn nice peak numbers, and sick pre vtec power. as long as its longevity doesnt prove poor, i will be thinking about this product in the future.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #360  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Mar 14 2006, 11:58 AM
RedMx5, thanks for the additional info. A few of my previous arguments are flawed...

From what I now understand, torque curves show what the forces the engine can produce over the engine's operating range. The horsepower curves show how that torque is effectively put to the wheels due to gearing.

I still have a hard time believing that an engine with a constant 200 lb-ft of torque from idle to redline will push you into your seat with the same force at all engine speeds. Maybe I'm stubborn
Slim, you're not being stubborn, you're just trying to make theory match your experiences. You are correct about an engine with a dead flat torque curve not producing linear acceleration, so it's more than fair to ask what the heck is going on. It's actually a very good question, and one I can answer.

The rule that A=F/M is idealized, in that it only considers three factors. In the real world, things are often a bit more complex. LOL, we don't live in a vacuum. The reason constant torque doesn't produce constant acceleration in the real world is because the *effective* mass (or "load") increases with increasing velocity. Air resistance and friction both eat up more of the force available to produce acceleration as speeds increase.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:21 PM.