BRP "Hotside" Supercharger
Originally Posted by trivium,Jan 19 2006, 11:38 PM
Im sorry but what are you talking about?
).Many, many iterations of supercharger kits have been tried on Miatas: coldsides, hotsides, intercooled, non-intercooled, Whipple/Lysholms, Autorotors, Eaton/Mangussons, etc.
One thing that people found is that the supercharger needs to be regulated by the throttle plate, blowing straight into the intake manifold, otherwise, you've just increased your throttled volume exponentially, which will cause all sorts of problems, including the fact that your supercharger will run full-bore against the throttle plate, as it's essentially wide-open and free to pump as much as it can.
A few people tried this back in the early days of PD Miata supercharging and found that they needed either giant blow-off valves to control the volume pumped by the supercharger, or a type of recirculating bypass valve, otherwise, your supercharger's going to blow off an intake pipe if you're lucky, or split your intercooler in two if you're not lucky (it's happened, and is now part of Miata forced induction lore
).These bypass valves have pretty much been perfected on the current generation Eaton/Magnusson blowers. They are progressive, work off the cars vacuum signal (so as to give a very smooth transition into boost) and are now internal, as opposed to the old JRSC M45 kits for Miatas that were external.
So yeah, anyway, in the vid, BRP had the blower strapped to the belts but un-throttled (because the throttle was still in the stock location), so it was basically pumping as much as the revs allowed. Like Brant said, this was for belt alignment and pulley testing. According to the BRP forum, they're shooting for a running prototype next week.
Originally Posted by bripab007,Jan 19 2006, 05:30 PM
Then again, the S2000 weighs quite a bit more than a Miata, so I guess the drivetrain's being submitted to greater forces.
I wish you guys the best of luck, but for a few more $$$, Lovefab gets you lots more horsepower with considerably less boost. Superchargers just can't touch turbochargers when you factor in efficiencies.
Originally Posted by slimjim8201,Jan 21 2006, 05:49 PM
I wish you guys the best of luck, but for a few more $$$, Lovefab gets you lots more horsepower with considerably less boost. Superchargers just can't touch turbochargers when you factor in efficiencies.
Guess it just depends on what you want. If you're looking for 450rwhp, then, yes, an MP62-based supercharged setup is the wrong place to look. If, however, you're looking for <325rwhp with gobs of torque and a very responsive throttle pedal, then you might be in line for PD supercharger.
As for the Miata guys not doing 7k clutch drops, no, I can't say I know a lot of them, however, I do recall a BRP coldside-powered Miata lunch an axle at the drag strip, launching at high RPMs and using drag radials. This would've been with ~200+lb-ft of torque at the wheels. I mean, when you've got a torque/power curve like this: http://brpforum.infopop.cc/groupee_files/a...%2FR4-Final.jpg or like this: http://flyinmiata.com/tech/dyno_runs/2.0_uber.pdf , there's not a whole lot of need to launch at 7k RPM. The S2000 will react somewhat differently, and the Miata is a much lighter car, but you're still gonna have more low-end torque than you know what to do with.
Originally Posted by bripab007,Jan 22 2006, 07:41 AM
And turbochargers sized for ~400+rwhp can't touch positive-displacement superchargers when it comes to liner power and torque delivery, responsiveness and low-end torque... (the Lovefab kits are tremendously cool-looking, well engineered, kits of course)
Guess it just depends on what you want. If you're looking for 450rwhp, then, yes, an MP62-based supercharged setup is the wrong place to look. If, however, you're looking for <325rwhp with gobs of torque and a very responsive throttle pedal, then you might be in line for PD supercharger.
As for the Miata guys not doing 7k clutch drops, no, I can't say I know a lot of them, however, I do recall a BRP coldside-powered Miata lunch an axle at the drag strip, launching at high RPMs and using drag radials. This would've been with ~200+lb-ft of torque at the wheels. I mean, when you've got a torque/power curve like this: http://brpforum.infopop.cc/groupee_files/a...%2FR4-Final.jpg or like this: http://flyinmiata.com/tech/dyno_runs/2.0_uber.pdf , there's not a whole lot of need to launch at 7k RPM. The S2000 will react somewhat differently, and the Miata is a much lighter car, but you're still gonna have more low-end torque than you know what to do with.
Guess it just depends on what you want. If you're looking for 450rwhp, then, yes, an MP62-based supercharged setup is the wrong place to look. If, however, you're looking for <325rwhp with gobs of torque and a very responsive throttle pedal, then you might be in line for PD supercharger.
As for the Miata guys not doing 7k clutch drops, no, I can't say I know a lot of them, however, I do recall a BRP coldside-powered Miata lunch an axle at the drag strip, launching at high RPMs and using drag radials. This would've been with ~200+lb-ft of torque at the wheels. I mean, when you've got a torque/power curve like this: http://brpforum.infopop.cc/groupee_files/a...%2FR4-Final.jpg or like this: http://flyinmiata.com/tech/dyno_runs/2.0_uber.pdf , there's not a whole lot of need to launch at 7k RPM. The S2000 will react somewhat differently, and the Miata is a much lighter car, but you're still gonna have more low-end torque than you know what to do with.
Originally Posted by Joe @ BRP,Jan 22 2006, 10:56 AM
We used a hotside MP62 for the 300rwhp run.
what are the expected power gain using the hotside set up on the S?
Originally Posted by Birdie,Jan 22 2006, 03:41 PM
damn I want to sit in that maita!!!!!!
what are the expected power gain using the hotside set up on the S?
what are the expected power gain using the hotside set up on the S?
Brant
Originally Posted by Brant @ BRP,Jan 22 2006, 12:46 PM
The Hotside MP62 setup will be capable of more, but we will probably be limited to around 325 RWHP with stock compression and pump gas.
Brant
Brant



