S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

BRP/SOT Hotside SC Install

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 08:32 AM
  #411  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

It does not mount to the header (I know what you meant just don
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #412  
ebeldesign's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena / Orange County
Default

[QUOTE=MugenRioS2k,Jan 28 2008, 09:32 AM] It does not mount to the header (I know what you meant just don
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #413  
neeman77's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Default

haha....I'm so jealous right now, can one of you guys just send me your kit and tell SOT you lost yours? lol...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #414  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

Originally Posted by ebeldesign,Jan 28 2008, 10:09 AM
Sorry to add to any confusion with that question. Thanks for the clarification.

For you guys that have installed and used this SC setup, what are your opinions comparing this to the Kraftwerks? These are the two that I am considering and was wondering about the differences/advantages of the SOT.

Thanks for the continued input on this!
Can not really comment on the Kraftwerks setup, but I much prefer my boost/power profile over CTSC and VTSC cars I have driven and ridden in.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #415  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I was originaly looking at the KW setup befor I took the plunge to go with SOT.


Here you go you can come to you own conclusions.


KW data was pulled directly form there website.

I can only compare the low boost KW setup at this time since we do not have a SOT dyno at higher pressures then 6.8lbs of boost at this time.





Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #416  
ebeldesign's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena / Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by MugenRioS2k,Jan 28 2008, 10:57 AM
I was originaly looking at the KW setup befor I took the plunge to go with SOT.


Here you go you can come to you own conclusions.


KW data was pulled directly form there website.

I can only compare the low boost KW setup at this time since we do not have a SOT dyno at higher pressures then 6.8lbs of boost at this time.





That SOT torque curve is unbelievable. Thanks for the comparo.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #417  
JustinC's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1
From: Selma, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MugenRioS2k,Jan 28 2008, 12:57 PM
I was originaly looking at the KW setup befor I took the plunge to go with SOT.


Here you go you can come to you own conclusions.


KW data was pulled directly form there website.

I can only compare the low boost KW setup at this time since we do not have a SOT dyno at higher pressures then 6.8lbs of boost at this time.





Not trying to say anything bad here, I have seen a roots style torque curve and the one for the SOT seems inaccurate of 200 tq from 1000 RPMS on, you have to build it at some point.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #418  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I extrapolated the TQ down from the lowest data point that has been gathered so far.
Approx 2700. for the SOT

In a real world application the TQ below that would defiantly ramp up because of your ramping of the throttle.

AKA you would not just floor it at 1000 rpms.


However if one was to go 100% TPS at 1000 then the torque would = what I have shown. Not like you would move any where because of clutch slip/ wheel spin however the theoretical TQ values below 3000 do parallel what one would expect to see in the real world if one was able to dump the throttle at 1000rpm.


Did the same thing with the KW populate the power curve down from 2500.

Excel extrapolates the numbers based on its understanding of the pattern the inputted real numbers demonstrate and the boost profiles equations programmed in for centrifugal compressors and positive displacement superchargers.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #419  
MugenRioS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 32
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by PilotKD,Nov 3 2007, 08:32 PM

you can see where WLAURENT rolled in to the throttel from 2000 up to about 4500
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #420  
JustinC's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 1
From: Selma, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MugenRioS2k,Jan 28 2008, 03:54 PM
you can see where WLAURENT rolled in to the throttel from 2000 up to about 4500
Yeah, that seems more like it
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:34 PM.