That means a manifold change... The only problem is chosing which one and keeping the car daily driveable.

 

Here is the Acceleration Graph

 

Awesome thread idea.

 

I must be an idiot, but I don't get the Acceleration plot, ?

 

Here is another

This is a perfect example as to why peak numbers don't mean much. We made the same peak numbers but in a race he would have pulled me.

Trbokev IP Street Kit vs My IP Street Kit

 

Not a stupid question at all, now if you were an engineer I would probably give you some crap. This is what I tell other professionals when it comes to being technically proficient in a field other than your own. You DEFINATLY don't want me to fly your jet and I don’t think my customers would be happy if you were designing my industrial equipment.

Torque when multiplied with the gear ratios and tire radius equals a force. Mass times a force equals acceleration or f=ma. So using a weight of 2700lb and our factory gears and tire diameters I calculated the acceleration at a given MPH. So the idea is that the more area there is under the line the faster the acceleration or the higher the line the better.


Here is were I go straight NERD. If you were to setup a step function and integrate (solves for the area under the curve) then you could take the next step and determine the time required to hit a certain speed. One more integration would lead to the time to get to a particular distance..... This is how the makers of desktop drag do it.

 

ok, just for a huge laugh, add mine too it.

i have the dynojet file if you want it. shoot me an email anthony@camuman.com

 

Thanks Scott for doing all these cool comparisons.

 

That graph is exactly why I went Greddy. For my daily driving, it's perfect. Congrats on the numbers though, they look great.