S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Electric Supercharger are back?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 10:00 AM
  #11  
KaNgArOo's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: wausau
Default

I didn't read through the whole test on the frx/brz site, but what was the gain. 10whp was what i saw on the dyno sheets. If that's the case it was $100 per 1whp gain.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 10:00 AM
  #12  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by camuman
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1406570003' post='23262716
[quote name='michaelnyden' timestamp='1406569289' post='23262692']
Maybe it doesn't have to make more power up top, it could just be a nice boost down low to get the s2000 going into that higher powerband.
Then the issue becomes, is it a restriction up top? Our motor breaths a lot more then a lower revving BRZ/FRS motor, so naturally this Electric sc will provide less positive pressure on an F motor in its peak efficiency range. If it could be designed in a way that provides enough positive pressure at a lower rpm and then doesn’t interfere as a butt plug with flow once the breathing of the motor exceeds that of the electric motor, then there would be something, assuming the electrical system could also handle it in a repetitive fashion on a road course or Auto X.

Its a nifty idea to get some easy low end trq out of the car.

Lol butt plug supercharger.
[/quote]

There is something for everyone in this world lol
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 10:25 AM
  #13  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 14
Default

I guess someone needs to try it on our car and dyno.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 12:07 PM
  #14  
riceball777's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 75
From: Los angeles
Default

I can believe those Frs/brz all jumping for joy for 200whp. Yeah so what a electric supercharger actually works. But for 10-20whp and at a cost of $1600. It does not seem worth it for me. I would rather spend triple that$$ for a real super charger or turbo setup so there can be some real Gaines
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 01:09 PM
  #15  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

It looks like you gain about 25whp and heaping of torque on the BRZ motor. That would scale up to about 30-35HP on our engines - which would probably be worth the $1600 for me. Heck, $1600 barely buys you a header and exhaust for this car - which combined might make 5-10HP in N/A form.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 01:20 PM
  #16  
black_EM1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default

Originally Posted by riceball777
I can believe those Frs/brz all jumping for joy for 200whp. Yeah so what a electric supercharger actually works. But for 10-20whp and at a cost of $1600. It does not seem worth it for me. I would rather spend triple that$$ for a real super charger or turbo setup so there can be some real Gaines
Plenty of us here that have spend upwards of $1k on a header or intake to only net 5whp.

Edit: Post right above me. Did not read before posting.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 01:29 PM
  #17  
s2000ellier's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 81
From: Florida
Default

If it could sustain 20whp up top all the time I would use it for road courses as there is negligible heat. I thought about email Phantom to get some details but all my reading suggest it would be impractical for minutes of duration.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #18  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 14
Default

Sounds like it would just be a way to get the low-end torque to get the S2000 going on autoX and street driving scenarios. I think if we can get someone to contact them and eventually test/dyno it before and after we can understand how this would pair to our powerband.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2014 | 02:57 PM
  #19  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 14
Default

This might be awesome if it could be combined with a traditional centrifugal S/C kit which doesn't make any boost down low because it is based on pulley speed. You would end up with something like a positive displacement/roots blower in which you have tangible power being made off idle essentially.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2014 | 10:18 AM
  #20  
v2kai's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

The system is legitimate and all claims and dynos posted are true. My friend is one of the beta-testers and I've also briefly met the creator.
It's a great product for the FRS/BRZ and eliminates the torque dip in their stock powerband. Only activated on WOT it's a nice kick in the pants and really brings the FRS/BRZ alive. Well worth it in my opinion for that application.

The limits of current design and technology doesn't appear to lend itself well to our vehicles. As others have mentioned, our higher RPM high flowing engines are not well suited to this. But every now and then I hear of updates to impellers and control systems from Phantom so who knows if something more suitable for the s2000 may eventually come down the pipe. As it is only engaged on WOT I would liken it more to an electric nitrous system than a full duty supercharger.

A few posts into that thread, I was the s2000 test pilot to compare an almost bone stock s2k with an early variant Phantom e-charger engaged and disengaged.

Against my CTSC AP1 it is actually quite impressive. Obviously doesn't compare in the top end range as boost tapers off, but if we were on a track or going through some twisties the comparable handling and added power makes for a great match up between the two vehicles.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLhZ31v0OEo[/media] - e-charger disabled
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wau1k13Gwc[/media] - e-charger enabled
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.