S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Engine let go on dyno

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 07:13 AM
  #61  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Over 400 especially supercharged is nothing at all for this engine. I've been over 400whp for 50k miles miles(193k miles total) and going strong. Just last year added meth but before that it was 93 pump only.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 08:21 AM
  #62  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Moddiction
I love the aem meth kit. Works great, faisafe setup works perfect as well. If any error, ecu dumps fuel and pulls tons of timing instantly. Great kit!
Not the same AEM “kit” in reference. You actually have a legit working failsafe. Still just a single port system though, which isnt the best for even cylinder distribution. But all depends on how much you’re injecting/relying on that distribution to prevent cylinder detonation. You might pull a plug on occasion and take a look at them to make sure your not seeing any cylinder firing irregularities, its possible you can detonate on one or multiple cylinders and not others from an uneven distribution. But again, it depends on how much of the water/meth your relying on.

Did you deal with/get to the bottom of your oil consumption issue that developed recently?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 09:40 AM
  #63  
boostedf22c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 14
From: Zionsville, IN
Default

You sure do assume a lot.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 10:01 AM
  #64  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by boostedf22c
You sure do assume a lot.
What am I assuming?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 10:10 AM
  #65  
boostedf22c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 14
From: Zionsville, IN
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by boostedf22c' timestamp='1426786820' post='23546648
You sure do assume a lot.
What am I assuming?
I just stated the success we had with a very simple setup at a very high level of power and performance. With fail safes. Used for thousands of miles and hundreds of dyno and track hits.

And you chimed in as if you knew exactly what we had on the car. The failsafes we didn't have in place and how we didn't put any time on it. And basically discredited what we did with the kit and how it's inferior in every way.

I'm not debating this.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 11:07 AM
  #66  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by Moddiction' timestamp='1426769327' post='23546248
I love the aem meth kit. Works great, faisafe setup works perfect as well. If any error, ecu dumps fuel and pulls tons of timing instantly. Great kit!
Not the same AEM “kit” in reference. You actually have a legit working failsafe. Still just a single port system though, which isnt the best for even cylinder distribution. But all depends on how much you’re injecting/relying on that distribution to prevent cylinder detonation. You might pull a plug on occasion and take a look at them to make sure your not seeing any cylinder firing irregularities, its possible you can detonate on one or multiple cylinders and not others from an uneven distribution. But again, it depends on how much of the water/meth your relying on.

Did you deal with/get to the bottom of your oil consumption issue that developed recently?

Oil consumption seems to have gone down. Not sure why. I still do burn some but I'm not even worried about it anymore. A lot let smoke out the exhaust now as well since running the meth. Less gas is being used so I guess a bunch of it was from the tune being conservative up top.

I am running a dual port catch can that is vented now which seemed to help some with the consumption. I do still burn oil but I haven't noticed nearly as much oil smell idling or anything. (Havent driven it since November though except a 5 minute around the block drive)
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 12:03 PM
  #67  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by boostedf22c
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1426788067' post='23546683
[quote name='boostedf22c' timestamp='1426786820' post='23546648']
You sure do assume a lot.
What am I assuming?
I just stated the success we had with a very simple setup at a very high level of power and performance. With fail safes. Used for thousands of miles and hundreds of dyno and track hits.

And you chimed in as if you knew exactly what we had on the car. The failsafes we didn't have in place and how we didn't put any time on it. And basically discredited what we did with the kit and how it's inferior in every way.

I'm not debating this.
[/quote]

Now I think your the one assuming here But when you say "AEM kit" one has to assume its in reference to their run of the mill progressive single port kit, which has a poor finicky injection controller and no failsafe other then a blinking light to tell you something is wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 12:11 PM
  #68  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by boostedf22c' timestamp='1426788650' post='23546697
[quote name='s2000Junky' timestamp='1426788067' post='23546683']
[quote name='boostedf22c' timestamp='1426786820' post='23546648']
You sure do assume a lot.
What am I assuming?
I just stated the success we had with a very simple setup at a very high level of power and performance. With fail safes. Used for thousands of miles and hundreds of dyno and track hits.

And you chimed in as if you knew exactly what we had on the car. The failsafes we didn't have in place and how we didn't put any time on it. And basically discredited what we did with the kit and how it's inferior in every way.

I'm not debating this.
[/quote]

Now I think your the one assuming here But when you say "AEM kit" one has to assume its in reference to their run of the mill progressive single port kit, which has a poor finicky injection controller and no failsafe other then a blinking light to tell you something is wrong.
[/quote]


You can connect it to ecu (I think nitrous port) and then any time that light is triggered you can setup the failsafe with the ecu. That is how mine is setup. I also have an electronic check valve installed right before the nozzle which helps prevent any water/meth from being dumped into there and puddling.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #69  
wadzii's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 11
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

The aem failsafe gauge is pretty bad ass.. you can use the 0-5v output from the failsafe gauge to modify the boost target. Set up your meth kit to come on however you want, once the gauge see's flow it will send that to the EMS, then as the flow increases you can also increase boost. Flow drops, so does boost. No map switching or hard cuts or anything like that.. Just a switch to turn on the meth kit
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2015 | 02:05 PM
  #70  
Suprdave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
Default

Carey is at the top of the food chain with this chassis/engine...I think it's kind of disrespectful to question the tidbits of knowledge he's droppin' with assumptive forum babble.

Single Nozzle Meth Kits were working WAY before anyone even had full control of their ECUs. Are there 'theoretically' better ways to chop the onion? Maybe...but a single meth nozzle def works.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.