S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Getting built and tuned!

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 12, 2009 | 04:32 AM
  #31  
BlitZs2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

It's been on the car. It's what blew my last motor, lol.

Look at the pic on the front page lol.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2009 | 05:37 AM
  #32  
TurboCongo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Default

Ill guess 465whp... Cant wait to see this one!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2009 | 07:08 AM
  #33  
BlitZs2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

Believe me, I can't wait to see it either. It seems every day now some bone stock GT mustang comes flying past my 09' Sonata.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2009 | 07:45 AM
  #34  
TurboCongo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Default

Originally Posted by BlitZs2000,Aug 12 2009, 07:08 AM
Believe me, I can't wait to see it either. It seems every day now some bone stock GT mustang comes flying past my 09' Sonata.
Yeah, my luck there all gonna disappear when im running the streets!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 12:42 AM
  #35  
YuriArts's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 666
Likes: 2
From: Holland
Default

Originally Posted by jwa4378,Aug 12 2009, 02:15 AM
Log manifold, or tubular?

I would guess is 450-475rwhp, if your tune is amazing. Your injectors and manifold (if log) and turbo are the limiting factors on lowered compression.

I hit 522rwhp with a tubular manifold, built bottom end, PortFlow head, 750cc injectors, but I had a gt35r turbo (which flows more CFMs). That was on an aggressive tune by Mase. Daily it was ~450ish.

John
You're definately right John, the log manifold is the main limiting factor.

I've also got a IP log manifold and a GT3076 bb turbo and it maxes at 395rwhp @ 1.5 bar. The tune could be a bit less conservative but I guess 425 is about the max you'll get. (on a real dyno that is).

I also had my block built, port flowed head, 3" exhaust etc..

Going to get a GT35R and Tubular manifold too.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 03:44 AM
  #36  
BlitZs2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

Wow. I didn't expect anything under 400 from a maxed out 30. We'll see how it goes, but that brings my hopes down some. lol.

Did some research and made a new thread. I didn't remember the number differences being so massive on log/tub. I'm going to try to get something else sometime soon.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #37  
HPCO$T's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok
Default

Shhhh.............



Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 05:32 AM
  #38  
kutsujula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

what rod's are yall using
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 05:37 AM
  #39  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by YuriArts,Aug 14 2009, 12:42 AM
You're definately right John, the log manifold is the main limiting factor.

I've also got a IP log manifold and a GT3076 bb turbo and it maxes at 395rwhp @ 1.5 bar. The tune could be a bit less conservative but I guess 425 is about the max you'll get. (on a real dyno that is).

I also had my block built, port flowed head, 3" exhaust etc..

Going to get a GT35R and Tubular manifold too.
Thats why I made 480whp on a 30R with a log......
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #40  
BlitZs2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

I wonder if PFAB makes the same numbers as inline pro! I'm just gonna wait and see what I end up with. Anything over 450 on a 3076 with a reliable log and kit like Inline Pro's is exactly what I'm looking for! I'll keep my fingers crossed.

Also, I wonder how big of a difference the A/R makes. The guy above might have had a scrub A/R.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 PM.