S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Greddy Turbo Kit !DYNO!

Thread Tools
 
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #101  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Guerillah,May 3 2007, 08:18 PM
200 more whp with a 3071r ? You sure about that?
I said about. This kit makes ~270, you can get easily get 400 out of the GT3071R. With some simple supporting mods you can get 450 without breaking a sweat.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #102  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Chris_Lum,May 3 2007, 08:04 PM
reliable for now, but running more than 9lbs (or so) on the S2000's high stock compression wont be for long. And you can use a thicker head gasket, but that will take more labor. the point is, the greddy kit is so easy to install, a novice can do it, no need to take the head off for a HG, no need for tuning, and EXTREMELY reliable straight out of the box. It is a conservative tune, on purpose, more power can be made simply by increasing the boost, but then the reliability factor comes into play.
I can't understand how anyone can say the kit is reliable if only ONE PERSON has it installed

We CAN say the inlinepro kit (for example) is reliable, with or without a headgasket, because so many of them are on the road now.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 05:57 PM
  #103  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

I am actually a little dissapointed with this kit only making 270WHP @ 7.5 PSI. They must be retarding the hell out of the timing and the manifold, etc.. must be super restrictive.

At 6.8 PSI I made 316WHP/210TQ with my Stage One Tuning SC kit. I am actually looking at getting Greddy's ULT and S2000 harness kit to use with my SC kit. Was going to go K-Pro but it looks like they are pushing out the dates on it.

Again - not comparing apples to apples here, and I am sure it will not take long for people to squeeze a few more ponies out of it.

Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #104  
BulldogS2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Default

Ok lets get one thing straight here, is it 270whp or 300 whp? The OP stated it was 300whp.

Anyhow, there are a lot of debates on this kit, especially comparing to inline. I think this kit cost wise, is best for the 06-07 because you don't have to spend another 2 grand for an ems. I'm not even going to speak about tuning, because I could careless if Greddy says that they already "pre-tuned" it, i think it will be smarter to get it re-tuned.

I think we all know that the Greddy kit will not compare to inline when speaking in HP, but in my case anyways, if this kit becomes CARB, I am sold simply because i drive a lot of surface streets and there are plenty of cops outthere.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:19 PM
  #105  
no_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chris_Lum,May 3 2007, 05:04 PM
reliable for now, but running more than 9lbs (or so) on the S2000's high stock compression wont be for long. And you can use a thicker head gasket, but that will take more labor. the point is, the greddy kit is so easy to install, a novice can do it, no need to take the head off for a HG, no need for tuning, and EXTREMELY reliable straight out of the box. It is a conservative tune, on purpose, more power can be made simply by increasing the boost, but then the reliability factor comes into play.
do you have the kit installed as well? i thought only one person has it......?
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:21 PM
  #106  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by BulldogS2,May 3 2007, 09:05 PM
Ok lets get one thing straight here, is it 270whp or 300 whp? The OP stated it was 300whp.
The previous dyno said 270 something REAR WHEEL horsepower.

The 300 number was a random guess at the CRANK horsepower (which would be higher since the wheel hp is 270)
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #107  
BulldogS2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,May 3 2007, 07:21 PM
The previous dyno said 270 something REAR WHEEL horsepower.

The 300 number was a random guess at the CRANK horsepower (which would be higher since the wheel hp is 270)
damn!!!!!! thats low, somebody give me a confirmation, i'm really considering this kit. If this is true, even at 9psi, it'll barely pass the 300 mark!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #108  
Trent06's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

Can I buy the $4000 inlinepro kit, bolt on and drive the piss out of it reliably with no more added costs than what comes with their $4000 kit? Thats what makes the greddy tempting because that is what i have been led to believe
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #109  
Will_ChinLee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

270?? The dyno is on page 1... i put down 279.5rwhp letting off early at ~8400rpm. again on a dyno dynamics dynomometer. if you want to see 300+, just dyno on a dynopack you'll see 10-12% more hp than on DD.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #110  
S2JK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

Originally Posted by BulldogS2,May 3 2007, 05:45 PM
damn!!!!!! thats low, somebody give me a confirmation, i'm really considering this kit. If this is true, even at 9psi, it'll barely pass the 300 mark!!!!!!!!
Heres a tip: dont rely on others "confirmation" when making big dollar purchases. Do your own research, especially on a public forum where anyone and their dog and chime in.

With that said, did you missed the dyno posted?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 PM.