highest powered sc s2000
Originally Posted by iApex,Nov 9 2009, 12:04 PM
What trim blower are you usuing now? I'm making 374 at 14 PSI on a dyno dynamics with the NOVI 1000. You're only running 2 #'s of boost more then me but making 120+ more horsepower. That dyno reads a little high IMO. Is this on race gas?
Dyno dynamics reads conservative like a Mustang. 362 HP on a Mustang dynos at 400 HP on a Dynojet. You should try dynoing on a Dynojet...you're likely over 400HP. You could also dyno on a Dynapack and see nice instant bump in HP.

I like the comparison board up above since a stock S is dynoing around 200 HP. That dyno seems about right so it's a good gauge for the rest of the combos shown.
Originally Posted by bagherra,Nov 9 2009, 12:38 PM
He's on a Dynapack. They're notorious for high readings. I would guess he's around 450-470 on a Dynojet.
Dyno dynamics reads conservative like a Mustang. 362 HP on a Mustang dynos at 400 HP on a Dynojet. You should try dynoing on a Dynojet...you're likely over 400HP. You could also dyno on a Dynapack and see nice instant bump in HP.
I like the comparison board up above since a stock S is dynoing around 200 HP. That dyno seems about right so it's a good gauge for the rest of the combos shown.
Dyno dynamics reads conservative like a Mustang. 362 HP on a Mustang dynos at 400 HP on a Dynojet. You should try dynoing on a Dynojet...you're likely over 400HP. You could also dyno on a Dynapack and see nice instant bump in HP.

I like the comparison board up above since a stock S is dynoing around 200 HP. That dyno seems about right so it's a good gauge for the rest of the combos shown.
FYI and clarification (not another dyno war thread). John_Z and I tuned on the same Dynapak. I did a STOCK baseline of 184hp 129 tq on bisimoto's dynapak.
A year earlier I went to Church's dynapak and got 215hp 148tq.
It's safe to assume that Bisi's dyno reads closer to a Dynojet, even a mustang.
sorry for the
Originally Posted by Sarek,Nov 9 2009, 03:57 PM
Generally speaking yes, dynapaks read higher.
FYI and clarification (not another dyno war thread). John_Z and I tuned on the same Dynapak. I did a STOCK baseline of 184hp 129 tq on bisimoto's dynapak.
A year earlier I went to Church's dynapak and got 215hp 148tq.
It's safe to assume that Bisi's dyno reads closer to a Dynojet, even a mustang.
sorry for the
FYI and clarification (not another dyno war thread). John_Z and I tuned on the same Dynapak. I did a STOCK baseline of 184hp 129 tq on bisimoto's dynapak.
A year earlier I went to Church's dynapak and got 215hp 148tq.
It's safe to assume that Bisi's dyno reads closer to a Dynojet, even a mustang.
sorry for the

Look, some tuners are certainly better than others. But there's no special sauce. It's not like a good tuner who hits 400whp on a supercharger setup is going to be 100whp less than a great tuner on that same supercharger setup. It doesn't work that way. There's only so much HP to be had and so much timing you can add and fuel you can pull before running on the ragged edge of what is possible.
It's safe to say he's making well into the 400's on any dyno anywhere and over 500 on some dynos. Yes, Bisi and Church are excellent tuners. I don't think it's necessarily because of the HP they extract. I think it's more because their tunes are consistent and reliable while making good power. Same with Inline, Mase, and host of other tuners out there.
We talk of certain tuners as if they can extract unusually high HP numbers. Surely, the particular dyno used accounts for the majority of the variance between peak tuner hp figures.
Originally Posted by bagherra,Nov 9 2009, 12:38 PM
He's on a Dynapack. They're notorious for high readings. I would guess he's around 450-470 on a Dynojet.
Dyno dynamics reads conservative like a Mustang. 362 HP on a Mustang dynos at 400 HP on a Dynojet. You should try dynoing on a Dynojet...you're likely over 400HP. You could also dyno on a Dynapack and see nice instant bump in HP.
I like the comparison board up above since a stock S is dynoing around 200 HP. That dyno seems about right so it's a good gauge for the rest of the combos shown.
Dyno dynamics reads conservative like a Mustang. 362 HP on a Mustang dynos at 400 HP on a Dynojet. You should try dynoing on a Dynojet...you're likely over 400HP. You could also dyno on a Dynapack and see nice instant bump in HP.

I like the comparison board up above since a stock S is dynoing around 200 HP. That dyno seems about right so it's a good gauge for the rest of the combos shown.
The dyno comparison chart above seems a little more accurate IMO. Sideways is running 4 #'s of boost more and making 25 Whp less then this dyno graph. I don't know what blower was used either im just speculating. Im at 374 at 14PSI and sideways was at 474 with 20PSI and a larger trim blower im pretty sure. Those numbers seem a little more realistic IMO.
Originally Posted by RAIN H8R,Nov 7 2009, 10:49 AM
18psi on a stock motor is not a good idea. Also, with 18psi you would put more hp down than 420. The car is refence earliker in this thread with 18psi has 9.8:1 with a 2.0L and put down 408 on Kings Dynojet. He also did a 12.777 with a 2.0 60ft at 117 mph, a trap speed like that is good for low 12s with an abusive launch.
The blower to get would be a 1200 with high boost on a stock motor, J's header, big TB/ported IM, fre flowing exhaust and you might hit mid to upper 400's.
The blower to get would be a 1200 with high boost on a stock motor, J's header, big TB/ported IM, fre flowing exhaust and you might hit mid to upper 400's.
I am no engineer yet, but just the simple fact that with a centrifugal supercharger you are only hitting that 18psi for a split second right at redline, vs a turbo such as a gt30r will be making that 18psi from 4500-redline. Obviously the motor can take more abuse in the higher range of the powerband so in that case the supercharger would be more "reliable" than a equal turbo set-up.
Of course you have to look at the heat that is being produced by the blower pushing that much air, and not being quite as effiecient as with just 10 psi, but with keeping the heat in check I personally don't see any reason why 18psi on a blower wont be any worse of an idea than a turbo. And everyone knows there are plenty of turbo guys running 18psi on stock motors these days. Like I said I am not engineer yet, but just my opinion is that as long as heat is not much of an issue, there should be no reason why I wouldn't be able to run a lot of psi with a blower!
Any thoughts on this?
Sorry for the thread jacking.
Originally Posted by iApex,Nov 9 2009, 01:04 PM
What trim blower are you usuing now? I'm making 374 at 14 PSI on a dyno dynamics with the NOVI 1000. You're only running 2 #'s of boost more then me but making 120+ more horsepower. That dyno reads a little high IMO. Is this on race gas?
Originally Posted by John_Z,Nov 9 2009, 08:24 PM
I'm running the stock V-2 blower on 91 pump. Keep in mind, I'm running a 2.2 and a built head that's ported and polished.



