S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

how much boost can stock handle

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #51  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

[QUOTE=05TurboS2k,Oct 14 2008, 04:58 PM] I didn't say centrifugal SC... I just said rarely turbo from the factory.

Roots makes HP down low not TQ so much...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #52  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 05TurboS2k,Oct 14 2008, 03:58 PM
I didn't say centrifugal SC... I just said rarely turbo from the factory.

Roots makes HP down low not TQ so much...

SC = TQ robbing. Roots style is VERY dependable though. However they create MASSIVE heat at high rpms then again most cars don't go to 9k. Power down low is what counts on a typical vehicle. I mean for a truck it's the obvious.... power off the line is critical when pulling a load. When it comes to a typical car the supercharger provides a nice 30-40% increase in hp and does it VERY reliable. It's really only when a car can't make the hp needed to make it competitive in a market that they use a Turbo which will give 50-100+% hp gains. If you have for example a 4.6L ford... do you really need anything more then a Kenne Bell (500-800hp range). Sure a Turbo will make this motor good for 1000 no problem but WHY? No reason. Better to stick to dependable power since it already has displacement.

My Tacoma TRD 3.4 uses a TRD roots style charger to get the job done... and they're famous for not handling ANY extra boost due to the heat.

Still FAR more superchargers of various kinds compared to turbo cars.... Turbo's are getting better and better though, I think we'll see more and more of them around.
As far as cars from the factory, I would say there are probably more turbo cars then there are SC cars. And lets not even get into trucks large trucks, EVERY single one is turbo charged and very reliable (they have to be, the average large truck is used well over half a million to a million miles before being replaced).

Just something to think about
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #53  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

535hp 400tq 3mm head gasket 17 psi, why not do the head gasket if your going for big power, its super cheap and proven time and time again, its not even bad to do it urself
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #54  
05TurboS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,119
Likes: 4
From: Seattle / Kalifornia
Default

previous owner of a Mini cooper.... which was ENDLESS PROBLEMS.... and still slow as shit hence the need for a turbo.

Audi (2 friended owned these and BOTH had the factory turbo's fail)/Volvo/Saab/ reliable???? ehh idk about that, I wouldn't call those dependable honestly.


I'd have to agree on factory equipped total for turbo cars.... you got me there, sitting here I can think of TONS. As for trucks are you talking diesel??? cause of course those are turbo we all know that. Diesel needs massive amounts of boost due to whole different ignition system and engine makeup.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #55  
mase1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Fastville, FL
Default

Its all about cylinder pressure, thats the thing you look at when you're talking about the max threshold of an engine.

not boost/whp

s2k internals are extremely strong, ive yet to see an engine fail from making too much power.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #56  
05TurboS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,119
Likes: 4
From: Seattle / Kalifornia
Default

^ ... you forgot heat MR. Expert I've never SEEN one fail either but... I'd say I've witnessed premature wear from the extra load.... sadly I'm witnessing this personally right now

(get the expert fired up here)
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #57  
mase1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Fastville, FL
Default

i didnt forget heat. how do you think cylinder pressure correlates with heat?

and I guess i should have clarified when i made my statement, considering we are talking about a properly tuned engine.

u can go destroy an engine w 3 psi and the smallest turbo ever.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #58  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

umm he is an expert
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #59  
05TurboS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24,119
Likes: 4
From: Seattle / Kalifornia
Default

Originally Posted by passmans2kny,Oct 14 2008, 02:25 PM
umm he is an expert
I know... that's why I'm poking fun at him.... I wouldn't make fun of a stupid person by calling them stupid. This is quite the opposite.

25psi from a T15 FTW!!!! haha
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #60  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 05TurboS2k,Oct 14 2008, 05:17 PM
previous owner of a Mini cooper.... which was ENDLESS PROBLEMS.... and still slow as shit hence the need for a turbo.

Audi (2 friended owned these and BOTH had the factory turbo's fail)/Volvo/Saab/ reliable???? ehh idk about that, I wouldn't call those dependable honestly.
dependable? well

our FI s2000s might be more reliable (jk, but not really in some cases)
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM.