S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

How reliable is the Comptech S/C kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #31  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=elusiv,Oct 18 2006, 11:22 PM]Just out of curiousity, where did you come to this conclusion? Is this a personal observation or was there a thread that discussed this specific topic?

Never knew 02-03's push out a few ponies more than the previous years. Glad I have an 02
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #32  
elusiv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Ah, forgot about that. I never paid attention too much to MY's and dyno results. I always wrote any differences off as the normal variation between dynos and dyno conditions.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #33  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by elusiv,Oct 18 2006, 11:20 PM
The first obstacle in the boost addiction you'll encounter is maxing out the stock injectors. As RedMX5 said, you'll max the injectors out at 320 rwhp or 7psi.

If you boost past these numbers, you got have no choice but to get bigger injectors and something to run them as the stock ECU will not.
There may actually be a way to make over 320 WHP without replacing the stock injectors, but it hasn't been proven yet. Richard Paul (AxialFlow Engineering) is planning to provide fuel enrichment for his axial flow supercharger by using one or more extra injectors that spray the fuel directly into the supercharger vanes. He has already tested this and decided that the charge cooling that takes place because of the latent heat of the fuel negates the need for auxiliary charge cooling. The extra injectors will have to have some kind of electroinc control independent of the stock ECU, and it is the number and size of the auxiliary injectors that will set the limit the max boost and power. According to Richard, the axial flow supercharger will cause the gasoline to evaporate totally so the fuel will not puddle in the intake, but I'm not positive that's actually going to work in practice. Our manifolds are designed to carry only air, and the bends may be too tight to carry a mixture without problems. We'll find out for sure when he finally gets around to putting one of the superchargers on an S2000. It's going to be interresting to see if he can actually make it work. To pass an emissions test all you'd have to do is pull the supercharger belt and (possibly) disconnect the extra injector(s).
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #34  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by elusiv,Oct 18 2006, 11:41 PM
Ah, forgot about that. I never paid attention too much to MY's and dyno results. I always wrote any differences off as the normal variation between dynos and dyno conditions.
Dyno runs do vary quite a bit, but on average you'll see that the later cars actually do make a little more power. In theory at least, since they run a little leaner, they should also get slightly better gas mileage.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #35  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 18 2006, 11:43 PM
There may actually be a way to make over 320 WHP without replacing the stock injectors, but it hasn't been proven yet. Richard Paul (AxialFlow Engineering) is planning to provide fuel enrichment for his axial flow supercharger by using one or more extra injectors that spray the fuel directly into the supercharger vanes. He has already tested this and decided that the charge cooling that takes place because of the latent heat of the fuel negates the need for auxiliary charge cooling. The extra injectors will have to have some kind of electroinc control independent of the stock ECU, and it is the number and size of the auxiliary injectors that will set the limit the max boost and power. According to Richard, the axial flow supercharger will cause the gasoline to evaporate totally so the fuel will not puddle in the intake, but I'm not positive that's actually going to work in practice. Our manifolds are designed to carry only air, and the bends may be too tight to carry a mixture without problems. We'll find out for sure when he finally gets around to putting one of the superchargers on an S2000. It's going to be interresting to see if he can actually make it work. To pass an emissions test all you'd have to do is pull the supercharger belt and (possibly) disconnect the extra injector(s).
I think its more like 330-350 is just about the absolute max you can go with stock injectors although its not recommended to go above much more then 330ish
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #36  
elusiv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 18 2006, 10:50 PM
Dyno runs do vary quite a bit, but on average you'll see that the later cars actually do make a little more power. In theory at least, since they run a little leaner, they should also get slightly better gas mileage.
Faster and better gas mileage for the 02-03 years? Forget the AP1 vs AP2 debate, MY02-03 AP1's are the best of the bunch LOL

As for the dyno runs, its good to hear that my tuner wasnt just pulling my leg and giving me slightly higher readings to satisfy his customer. My dyno plots seemed a tad on the high side, but i guess if im comparing to an FI'd MY00-01, that would explain the discrepancy.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 10:25 AM
  #37  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Oct 18 2006, 11:53 PM
I think its more like 330-350 is just about the absolute max you can go with stock injectors although its not recommended to go above much more then 330ish
I'm allowing for a reasonable safety margin. Comptech will tune a customers car to make (in the neighborhood of) 320 WHP (pully change and tuning) but no more, and I don't think it's wise to push the injectors to the ragged edge (we're already close at 320) for what amounts to a small increase in power. The absolute max probably varies from car to car. AP2's might easily make 330 or more on their stock injectors, but I really don't know. I rarely look at what people are doing with their AP2's, because they're a different animal.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #38  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=elusiv,Oct 19 2006, 12:34 AM]Faster and better gas mileage for the 02-03 years? Forget the AP1 vs AP2 debate, MY02-03 AP1's are the best of the bunch LOL
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #39  
elusiv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 19 2006, 12:25 PM
I'm allowing for a reasonable safety margin. Comptech will tune a customers car to make (in the neighborhood of) 320 WHP (pully change and tuning) but no more, and I don't think it's wise to push the injectors to the ragged edge (we're already close at 320) for what amounts to a small increase in power. The absolute max probably varies from car to car. AP2's might easily make 330 or more on their stock injectors, but I really don't know. I rarely look at what people are doing with their AP2's, because they're a different animal.
Agreed. You'll sooner turn your injector spray pattern into a jet stream if you try for 350
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
package
Περιοχή μόνο για μέλη
160
Jul 21, 2014 07:58 AM
duff0000
Forced Induction For Sale
2
Aug 18, 2012 09:04 PM
jdmdohcpower
Want to Buy
0
Oct 18, 2004 02:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 AM.