S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

How reliable is the Comptech S/C kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #21  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Here's a link to the banjo bolt DIY thread:

https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=102067

EDIT: FWIW, I did upgrade my banjo bolts before installing the SC/AC, just for "peace of mind."
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #22  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by raymo19,Oct 18 2006, 02:08 PM
In this case an oil jet bolt or oil squirter.
The banjo bolt supplies oil to the banjo that feeds the "squirter," and holds the banjo in place. The reason the banjo is called a "banjo" is because that's what it looks like (sort of). The banjo bolt is called a "banjo bolt" because it's the bolt that holds the banjo in place. Banjo bolts (in general) are hollow and have crosswise holes to allow fluids to pass throught them and into a banjo fitting.

Here's a picture of a generic banjo (but it's not exactly like the ones used in our engines):

Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #23  
AROD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: long island, new york
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 18 2006, 01:51 PM
I don't believe it was the banjo bolts that caused your failure. Modifry went 180,000 miles on his supercharged S2000, and he never upgraded his banjo bolts. Since he tracked the car regularly and drove it a lot harder than most his lack of problems isn't a result of taking it easy on the car. Who told you the failure was related to the banjo bolts, and why did they think the failure was related to the bolts?
every car is different. some may run fine with same mods as a car that doesn't. The reason they say it it was the banjo bolts that caused the failure was the reason that the number 4 cylinder was scored. If you have done any research, there has been many and i mean many people who have had the number 4 cyl failure, due to the banjo bolts. In europe the bolts were recalled, but they said the reason is they drive the car harder in europe. lol pretty funny right
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I've had my Comptech S/C for close to two years now, and haven't run into any reliablity issues or problems with the kit. The car has been as reliable since the day I bought her new. Installed it myself at 40K miles, and today I'm at 76K miles.

Just keep up on your regular maintenance and you'll be fine. Also, there's no need for a "tougher" bottom end or a standalone (like the EMS). The Comptech kit is perfectly fine as "bolt on and go" mod.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #25  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=AROD,Oct 18 2006, 05:14 PM]every car is different. some may run fine with same mods as a car that doesn't.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #26  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by 73Zero,Oct 18 2006, 05:24 PM
I've had my Comptech S/C for close to two years now, and haven't run into any reliablity issues or problems with the kit. The car has been as reliable since the day I bought her new. Installed it myself at 40K miles, and today I'm at 76K miles.

Just keep up on your regular maintenance and you'll be fine. Also, there's no need for a "tougher" bottom end or a standalone (like the EMS). The Comptech kit is perfectly fine as "bolt on and go" mod.
^^ That's consistent with the experience of the VAST majority of people who have supercharged their S2000's using either a Vortech or Comptech kit.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #27  
BulldogS2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 18 2006, 04:06 PM
^^ That's consistent with the experience of the VAST majority of people who have supercharged their S2000's using either a Vortech or Comptech kit.
so what are you numbers on the dyno then, w/o ems or vafc?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #28  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by BulldogS2,Oct 18 2006, 08:54 PM
so what are you numbers on the dyno then, w/o ems or vafc?
Early AP1's (MY00-01) like mine typically make around 287 WHP on the dyno, and my car is typical. I haven't had the car on a dyno; We measure performance using three axis accelerometers, so I prefer not to make direct comparisons. With the CTSC/AC MY00-01 cars make between 270 and 290 WHP while MY02-03 cars make a little more (280-300 seems to be typical). With the Vortech you get a little more with either car because the boost is a little higher. Stock injectors are good for about 320 WHP if you want to mess with pully upgrades and tuning. I don't know if that can be improved upon with an EMS or VAFC, because that's already pusing the stock injectors.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #29  
elusiv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

The first obstacle in the boost addiction you'll encounter is maxing out the stock injectors. As RedMX5 said, you'll max the injectors out at 320 rwhp or 7psi.

If you boost past these numbers, you got have no choice but to get bigger injectors and something to run them as the stock ECU will not.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 08:22 PM
  #30  
elusiv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Oct 18 2006, 08:35 PM
With the CTSC/AC MY00-01 cars make between 270 and 290 WHP while MY02-03 cars make a little more (280-300 seems to be typical).
Just out of curiousity, where did you come to this conclusion? Is this a personal observation or was there a thread that discussed this specific topic?

Never knew 02-03's push out a few ponies more than the previous years. Glad I have an 02
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 AM.