I LOVE E85!
Originally Posted by JDMisGOOD,Dec 1 2007, 08:14 PM
Straight e85, hands down!
Getting them to idle isn't too bad... They just tend to run a bit fat. lol
Getting them to idle isn't too bad... They just tend to run a bit fat. lol
92 octane plus meth injection is going to be pretty close to E85. I can't say I would agree with your....in all caps.... HANDS DOWN!!!!! I would pick E85 also but would more agree that they are VERY close, instead of your post making it sound like its a LANDSLIDE difference as to which one is better.
J. R.
Originally Posted by flexer,Dec 1 2007, 09:58 PM
Ummm.....
92 octane plus meth injection is going to be pretty close to E85. I can't say I would agree with your....in all caps.... HANDS DOWN!!!!! I would pick E85 also but would more agree that they are VERY close, instead of your post making it sound like its a LANDSLIDE difference as to which one is better.
J. R.
92 octane plus meth injection is going to be pretty close to E85. I can't say I would agree with your....in all caps.... HANDS DOWN!!!!! I would pick E85 also but would more agree that they are VERY close, instead of your post making it sound like its a LANDSLIDE difference as to which one is better.
J. R.
e85 no contest! Much simpler and cheaper for the enthusiast.
I was planning on running 92octane which is the highest available here in the midwest and water/meth... but this E85 thread and other things I've read on tuning with the fuel makes me interested in which would be better for me... although I like the easy availability of 92 octane if I were to drive the S out of state...
i know our cars have low torque and everything but yours seem to be kinda on the low low side. shouldn't it be around 430ish with that much power? i mean i made 310 or something with just 478whp
either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos
either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos
Originally Posted by batikan,Dec 3 2007, 12:53 AM
i know our cars have low torque and everything but yours seem to be kinda on the low low side. shouldn't it be around 430ish with that much power? i mean i made 310 or something with just 478whp
either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos
either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos

EDIT: Saw you said 'something'
Originally Posted by JDMisGOOD,Dec 2 2007, 11:26 AM
It is a "Landslide" difference as you put it.
e85 no contest! Much simpler and cheaper for the enthusiast.
e85 no contest! Much simpler and cheaper for the enthusiast.
QUICK go do some reading.
J. R.
Originally Posted by flexer,Dec 3 2007, 01:08 AM
Alright. Then explain to me why it is such a landslide? Learn the properties of each any maybe your answer will change.
QUICK go do some reading.
J. R.
QUICK go do some reading.
J. R.
Originally Posted by Soul Coughing,Dec 3 2007, 12:57 AM
your sig says you 'only' made 288? but you said you made 310?
EDIT: Saw you said 'something'
EDIT: Saw you said 'something'








