S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

I LOVE E85!

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #41  
flexer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by JDMisGOOD,Dec 1 2007, 08:14 PM
Straight e85, hands down!



Getting them to idle isn't too bad... They just tend to run a bit fat. lol
Ummm.....

92 octane plus meth injection is going to be pretty close to E85. I can't say I would agree with your....in all caps.... HANDS DOWN!!!!! I would pick E85 also but would more agree that they are VERY close, instead of your post making it sound like its a LANDSLIDE difference as to which one is better.
J. R.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #42  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Dan, you have a PM. E85...HANDS DOWN, BEOTCH!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #43  
JDMisGOOD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flexer,Dec 1 2007, 09:58 PM
Ummm.....

92 octane plus meth injection is going to be pretty close to E85. I can't say I would agree with your....in all caps.... HANDS DOWN!!!!! I would pick E85 also but would more agree that they are VERY close, instead of your post making it sound like its a LANDSLIDE difference as to which one is better.
J. R.
It is a "Landslide" difference as you put it.

e85 no contest! Much simpler and cheaper for the enthusiast.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #44  
LittleBluePill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

For ultimate performance meth is much better at cooling than E85.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #45  
SPECIAL-OPS-S2K's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 1
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

I was planning on running 92octane which is the highest available here in the midwest and water/meth... but this E85 thread and other things I've read on tuning with the fuel makes me interested in which would be better for me... although I like the easy availability of 92 octane if I were to drive the S out of state...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #46  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

i know our cars have low torque and everything but yours seem to be kinda on the low low side. shouldn't it be around 430ish with that much power? i mean i made 310 or something with just 478whp

either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #47  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

Originally Posted by batikan,Dec 3 2007, 12:53 AM
i know our cars have low torque and everything but yours seem to be kinda on the low low side. shouldn't it be around 430ish with that much power? i mean i made 310 or something with just 478whp

either way, nice numbers. put on some drag radials on that thing and post some videos
your sig says you 'only' made 288? but you said you made 310?

EDIT: Saw you said 'something'
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #48  
flexer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by JDMisGOOD,Dec 2 2007, 11:26 AM
It is a "Landslide" difference as you put it.

e85 no contest! Much simpler and cheaper for the enthusiast.
Alright. Then explain to me why it is such a landslide? Learn the properties of each any maybe your answer will change.

QUICK go do some reading.

J. R.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #49  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Originally Posted by flexer,Dec 3 2007, 01:08 AM
Alright. Then explain to me why it is such a landslide? Learn the properties of each any maybe your answer will change.

QUICK go do some reading.

J. R.
No, no, no. I said, Hands down. Pretty much said it to annoy you cuz I know you like meth injection...hehe
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 05:48 AM
  #50  
batikan's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Soul Coughing,Dec 3 2007, 12:57 AM
your sig says you 'only' made 288? but you said you made 310?

EDIT: Saw you said 'something'
I hit 310 within the dyno session but then the last pull where we left the tuning, i made 288
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 AM.