S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

lets talk redlines

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 05:52 AM
  #1  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default lets talk redlines

whats up guys, so I will be getting my car back on the road soon with a few changes to my set up(turbo, intercooler and piping, dumps, blah blah) but one thing I wanted to bring up was my redline, I switched to an ap1 intake cam this time around, have a fully built ap2 bottom end 11:1 comp, full ferrera valve train, I was thinking about running 9000, thoughts? insight?
-matt
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 06:22 AM
  #2  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

What is the stroke of the new motor?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 06:59 AM
  #3  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

stock ap2 stroke i guess, its actually an ap1 head on my block this time, but with my ap2 exhaust cam and an ap1 intake cam
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 07:00 AM
  #4  
baZurk's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: SOMD
Default

If it is still an ap2 crank then I would keep redline at 8500. I don't know if your aftermarket pistons/connecting rods take away any rotating mass or even if that increases that safe limit for revs.


EDIT: Who built the motor? What do they say?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 07:57 AM
  #5  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

its cp pistons, crower rods, i went with super thick wrist pins this time so thats def added weight there, and the rods are def heavier than stock, im guessing the pistons are similar in weight to stock, so over all its heavier than stock, john at machine world built the motor, now hes become wre, wright racing engines
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
bruthaboost's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 944
Likes: 67
From: Midland
Default

Your piston speed will be high (mean speed of 27.21 m/s) as well as your side loads as a result of the shorter rod and greater momentum from your higher piston speeds. That's F1 territory for piston speeds.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 11:34 AM
  #7  
Honda_Mad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

If it makes power past 8500 and built right I don't think u will have issues revving it to 9000 rpm
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 26, 2014 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
funkyWEASEL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

if you have the funds to rebuild it if 9000 hurts the motor, go for it. If you do not want to risk losing the motor, 8500 is sufficient.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 12:32 PM
  #9  
Redline S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 2
Default

You rang?

I wouldn't go past 8500 with an ap2 crank.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 02:26 PM
  #10  
1SlowSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 3
Default

You will have no issues revving to 9K since your motor is now built from head to toe. I have been revving to 9k for 3 years without any issues. Others on AP2's have been revving to 9500k without issues. I would just stop where it stops making power.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM.