S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

need help on identifying turbo kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #41  
joshuo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

that's what i've been thinking about. I might just be better off to get a bone stock car, and then put a Comptech SC unit in it, because reliability is a big factor for me.

what kind of numbers are the superchargers seeing? is 350WHP possible with a SC?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 07:18 AM
  #42  
c_me_go's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,330
Likes: 13
From: Under the sun
Default

350 is possible with a SC.. but you also have to upgrade many parts that comes with a SC kit.. like injectors,pulley,,,ect, ect... but it would be a little cheaper plus you know what you are putting in your car... a SC is great for every day.. I think you would have alot of problems with that turbo kit..
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #43  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

How much do they want for the car?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #44  
nyanko's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
Default

[QUOTE=afwfjustin,Dec 12 2006, 12:53 PM]I hope you don't venture out into s2000talk often then...
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #45  
Scorpion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: Riverview
Default

Originally Posted by nyanko,Dec 14 2006, 02:07 PM
sometimes i wonder how these different theories come about.. if you think about it, why would you need vacuum on a pressurized system? It is already providing it's own pressure (thus, vacuum is not needed). anyhow, i am glad this got cleared up peacefully.
Since when is the crank case supposed to be a pressurized system? If you have a lot of positive pressure in the crankcase then be prepaired for your engine to fail.

Also fperra, yes you are running a breather, but you are also running a krankvent. There is a differance between doing that and just sticking a little filter on the end of a hose.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #46  
nyanko's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
Default

[QUOTE=Scorpion,Dec 15 2006, 05:56 AM]Since when is the crank case supposed to be a pressurized system?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #47  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Dec 11 2006, 10:18 PM
I guess the front breather is why I can only could get a little over 500 whp at 17 psi on pump gas.

Hey Fred,

Is your front valve cover Krank vent flowing away from the engine or towards. Mine is set up as both vents flow the air away from the engine. Is this right? Basically, when my rear pcv krank vent is closed due to boost, the front cover vent is now open; and vise versa without boost. Is this correct?

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #48  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

The krank vents both flow away from the crankcase. There is also a larger one and a smaller one and they both follow sufficiently without causing a restriction. You can also replace your factory PCV and install a fitting if you want to and that will create a vacuum faster since the krank vents can out flow the factory PCV.

As you can kind of see in this picture:
http://automotivespeed.com/product_info.ph...&products_id=49

There are black silicone caps on the krank vents. They are put on the side that should be facing the valve cover/crankcase. So basically just have those caps face the crankcase and you should have the correct direction for the krank vents. Be sure to blow through it though and verify that it is correct just be sure.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #49  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

Originally Posted by Scorpion,Dec 14 2006, 12:56 PM
Since when is the crank case supposed to be a pressurized system? If you have a lot of positive pressure in the crankcase then be prepaired for your engine to fail.

Also fperra, yes you are running a breather, but you are also running a krankvent. There is a differance between doing that and just sticking a little filter on the end of a hose.
Yes, I am running a KrankVent. But if I wasn't running a KV, a breather on the front valve cover vent would have no affect on the PCV operation, and from a performance standpoint, would be better than returning the oil fumes back to the intake manifold. From an EPA standpoint it wouldn't be a good thing to have.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #50  
Scorpion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: Riverview
Default

Originally Posted by fperra,Dec 14 2006, 05:08 PM
Yes, I am running a KrankVent. But if I wasn't running a KV, a breather on the front valve cover vent would have no affect on the PCV operation, and from a performance standpoint, would be better than returning the oil fumes back to the intake manifold. From an EPA standpoint it wouldn't be a good thing to have.
Can't argue with you on that
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
purekoryo
S2000 Forced Induction
14
Nov 22, 2010 01:21 PM
pastoli
Want to Buy
8
Nov 7, 2009 08:27 PM
JuicedS2K
S2000 Forced Induction
26
Jul 9, 2009 05:47 AM
Boost76
S2000 Forced Induction
5
Nov 19, 2007 03:06 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.