S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

New supercharger kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #41  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Originally Posted by trivium,Nov 2 2006, 05:44 AM
Im sorry, I forgot this was a public forum. How rude of me.
Don't be sorry. This IS a public forum. You're free to be rude all day.

Oh, you apparently already know this.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 04:43 PM
  #42  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by Soul Coughing,Nov 1 2006, 03:11 PM
a roots style supercharger uses more energy to spin than a centrifugal supercharger... (what it gives up in efficiency it gives back in a flat low end torque curve) my last car had one.... just like the centrifugal supercharger it has a bypass valve that drops the boost when cruising... but it is still using engine power to spin the supercharger no matter what design... unless its a mercedes design with a A/C style clutch to disengage the S/C when cruising.
Completely depends on the load.

At full load a centrifugal compressor will be more efficient than a roots style blower. But how often are you at full load? Depending on your driving style and driving location, I'd guess 1-10%?

You can throw a bypass valve on a centrifugal supercharger but you cannot stop the fact that it is always compressing the air in it's housing through internal compression. In bypass mode, roots chargers hardly draw any power at all. The design itself dicates that they cannot compress air on their own, and when not at high load, the more or less free-wheel. They are merely "air movers" and not "air compressors". For this reason, they are also less efficient under full load.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #43  
S2Kstuntin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Waianae,HI
Default

I'm glad that I waited to purchase F/I. Seems like as soon as I was going to purchase one everyone started coming out with all the new kits.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #44  
kane.s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 0
From: The Beach, CA
Default

Correct, the roots types do not actually compress the air which is really the biggest functional difference between them.

I wrote this a while back which is pretty easy to understand:
http://www.s2000turbo.com/index.php?option...id=91&Itemid=27

The kits are actually not completed yet but should be soon. There will be variable sizes and kits available.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #45  
jakub2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 1
From: Slovakian living in Dubai
Default

Originally Posted by trivium,Nov 1 2006, 02:47 PM
Centrifugal kits develop power when you are within the power range. Didnt you know that?
What has "developing power" and "powerrange" to do with boosting while cruizing?
There is no system that "has boost when running 80 on the highway at 4k rpm". Boost is not created by the SC or the turbo but by the resistance of the intake manifold.Try to blow into a straw with open end and into one with a squeezed end
Since you bleed the boost off with a valve (bypass or blow off) during cruizing ('power range" or not) you are NOT boosting.
BTW where does the "power range" start ?
Here?



To sum it up:

A turbo has a BOV so it does not boost while cruizing.
A SC has a bypass valve so it does not boost while cruizing.
And you have oversmart comments so we consider you an a$$.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:38 PM
  #46  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

FIGHT!
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 01:50 AM
  #47  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jakub2000,Nov 2 2006, 12:00 AM
What has "developing power" and "powerrange" to do with boosting while cruizing?
There is no system that "has boost when running 80 on the highway at 4k rpm". Boost is not created by the SC or the turbo but by the resistance of the intake manifold.Try to blow into a straw with open end and into one with a squeezed end
Since you bleed the boost off with a valve (bypass or blow off) during cruizing ('power range" or not) you are NOT boosting.
BTW where does the "power range" start ?
Here?



To sum it up:

A turbo has a BOV so it does not boost while cruizing.
A SC has a bypass valve so it does not boost while cruizing.
And you have oversmart comments so we consider you an a$$.
Im confused... you are posting a vid of power ranges and then calling me "oversmart" ?
The sand must be getting in your food.
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #48  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by kane.s2k,Nov 2 2006, 01:38 AM
Correct, the roots types do not actually compress the air which is really the biggest functional difference between them.

I wrote this a while back which is pretty easy to understand:
http://www.s2000turbo.com/index.php?option...id=91&Itemid=27

The kits are actually not completed yet but should be soon. There will be variable sizes and kits available.
Not a bad summary, but I believe it is the roots-style charger that specifically does not have contacting lobes. Most twin-screw (Whipple) chargers have a ceramic coating on the lobes that initially causes them to "interfere" so that a perfect seal can be achieved. This seal is much less important with the roots design due to the lack of internal compression.

The Roots heat generation is largely due to inefficiencies in the design, in that it causes the air to "crash" together upon exiting the lobes.

I'll post come CFD images shortly. Pretty sexy stuff...


From your site:
The twin screw also differs from the roots in that the rotors do not ever actually touch which reduces wear and friction (heat) greatly.
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #49  
djpeak10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Default

Old Nov 2, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #50  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

So why exactly isnt a twin screw available for the S yet?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.