S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Please explain why SC or TC is better.

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #1  
rai's Avatar
rai
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 10
From: mount airy
Default Please explain why SC or TC is better.

I'm new to FI forum.

Could someone please point out the pros and cons of FI, SC v TC?

In particular, which would is safer (ie. less likely to harm the engine)?

Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
Ztec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

You can get beat up posting this question this has been debated,evaluated,drug through the mud etc... alot and if the search didn't suck so bad I would tell you to go there.
A stock Supercharger system will overall be less harmfull to your engine than a Turbo setup.
Flame on
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #3  
04RioS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Default

man you been here for like 3 years, you think you learn how to search by now...... but yea sc is less harmful as you'll only see real power when in higher rpm as turbo is all through the power band......
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #4  
SIIK2NR's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 2
From: San Diego, Wess-Side!!
Default

All the answers to your questions here...

Super Charger versus Turbo Charger
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #5  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

I still protest against the 'less harmful' comment. A properly tuned and driven turbo S should be no more harmful than an SC S. It's just that having a turbo gives more potential to abuse, and many cut corners.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
Ztec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

I do agree on that point - I guess your right foot has more to do with it than anything
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #7  
bigpurp's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 3
Default

Turbo: Faster; comes with lots of headaches.

SC: Not as fast; little to no headaches.

There u have it, in a nutshell.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 10:58 AM
  #8  
nsxinsac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bigpurp,Nov 3 2005, 10:15 AM
Turbo: Faster; comes with lots of headaches.

SC: Not as fast; little to no headaches.

There u have it, in a nutshell.
I have had both setups and good not agree with you more. With that being said, my CTSC @ 9psi vs my T3/T4 @ 7psi there is no comparrison in terms of straight line power. But it has cost me more $$$ and head ache, and I spend lots of extra $$$ to not ''cut corners''.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miatas2k
S2000 Forced Induction
17
Jan 23, 2015 07:36 PM
Rino
S2000 Under The Hood
10
Dec 15, 2004 11:10 PM
sircyber
S2000 Under The Hood
12
May 11, 2003 03:34 PM
TTSUPRA
S2000 Talk
8
Jul 19, 2002 02:07 PM
ferrariman
S2000 Talk
5
Feb 22, 2002 11:01 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.