PTUNING S2000 Turbo System (Pics, Dyno, Pricing)
Both kits have their Advantages and Disadvantages.
For myself I'm really liking what the Ptunning kit has to offer compared to other kits atm.
Ok i may have over stated that aspect (boost spool up time). But comparing these directly i think we are to the point of spliting hairs. The sos may spool sooner mostly because of the extremly short runners more so than the divided housing. However the harsh 90 degree bends that are on the sos manifold do not promote quick up spool.
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Toan,
Thank you for the reply! You posted a picture of exactly what I needed to see! Below is the post I was referring to. It seems the motor mount failed for Batbite, or perhaps the photo is showing something else...? My last question is, how does the "time attack red" powder coating match the factory color/wrinkle of the factory S2000 valve cover?
As far as the SOS vs Ptuning, I already know it will pull the rug under SOS's feet as far as hp/trq, as well as response and EVERYTHING else, I just didnt want to put it that way initially. I want people to see the main difference, and doing that on the same dyno will prove it even for the non believers.
Dustin
NP Dustin,
If I remember correctly, what appeared to be a hairline crack at first site was actually nothing at all. Maybe Batbite can chime in on this. The mount and mounting ears are cut from 1/8" thick steel and are about 2" wide. Breaking this steel mount would likely be difficult to do. However, if we were to ever run across an issue, we would surely address it immediately.
Our Time Attack Red is a little bit brighter than the factory valve cover and has a lower texture to it. Personally I would recommend powder coating the valve cover at the same time. We can quote you on this if you'd like. The powercoating on the factory valve cover, like the intake manifold on an STi, has a coarse texture and is a PITA to keep clean anyhow. IMO
- Toan
Thank you for the reply! You posted a picture of exactly what I needed to see! Below is the post I was referring to. It seems the motor mount failed for Batbite, or perhaps the photo is showing something else...? My last question is, how does the "time attack red" powder coating match the factory color/wrinkle of the factory S2000 valve cover?
As far as the SOS vs Ptuning, I already know it will pull the rug under SOS's feet as far as hp/trq, as well as response and EVERYTHING else, I just didnt want to put it that way initially. I want people to see the main difference, and doing that on the same dyno will prove it even for the non believers.
Dustin
Originally Posted by Batbite' timestamp='1341634368' post='21840493
When I was under the car looking to see what was what.... I noticed that the PTuning passenger side motor mount had also craked all the way around


Andrew (or one of the other Cust Svc Guys) I'll give you a call in the am. I'm going to have a local shop Tig-Weld the DT, but I could use a bit of help with a rep Motor Mount.
Thx


Andrew (or one of the other Cust Svc Guys) I'll give you a call in the am. I'm going to have a local shop Tig-Weld the DT, but I could use a bit of help with a rep Motor Mount.
Thx
If I remember correctly, what appeared to be a hairline crack at first site was actually nothing at all. Maybe Batbite can chime in on this. The mount and mounting ears are cut from 1/8" thick steel and are about 2" wide. Breaking this steel mount would likely be difficult to do. However, if we were to ever run across an issue, we would surely address it immediately.
Our Time Attack Red is a little bit brighter than the factory valve cover and has a lower texture to it. Personally I would recommend powder coating the valve cover at the same time. We can quote you on this if you'd like. The powercoating on the factory valve cover, like the intake manifold on an STi, has a coarse texture and is a PITA to keep clean anyhow. IMO
- Toan
Originally Posted by RAIN H8R' timestamp='1387231681' post='22925498
as well as response and EVERYTHING else, I just didnt want to put it that way initially. I want people to see the main difference, and doing that on the same dyno will prove it even for the non believers.
Both kits have their Advantages and Disadvantages.
For myself I'm really liking what the Ptunning kit has to offer compared to other kits atm.
Ok i may have over stated that aspect (boost spool up time). But comparing these directly i think we are to the point of spliting hairs. The sos may spool sooner mostly because of the extremly short runners more so than the divided housing. However the harsh 90 degree bends that are on the sos manifold do not promote quick up spool.
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Originally Posted by s2000442' timestamp='1387219975' post='22925126
What do consider extensive testing? There was a guy"Metros" who tracked his car quite a bit and had no overheating issues. He also had the optional oil cooler as well. I think if you want to track the car shielding like I have done would help tremendously. Keeping the boost lowered would also help. 8-10psi for a road course. Maybe up boost to 14 in 4th or higher gears. This kit and the SOS kit are probably the best for a road course.
Yes, Metros was our first track customer. We installed the first production PTUNING turbo system on his AP2 on a Wednesday and developed a dynotuned K-Pro map running 13.5 psi on a Thursday. He picked the car up on Friday and ran Saturday and Sunday events at Summit Point main using our oil cooler system and stock rediator. 30 minute HPDE sessions were no problem that weekend as the temps were cooler in the fall.
Even though he didn't have cooling issues in the fall, he opted to play it safe and upgrade to a Koyo radiator over the winter. He signed up for several HPDE events over the course of the next spring and summer. The weather in VA can easily get over 90 degrees with very high humidity during the hot summer months too.
Some things to note that may explain why we have had success running our turbo system on a road course.
- We have the lowest mounted turbo on the market. Less radiant heat into the engine compartment.
- Our short runner manifold radiates significantly less heat than a manifold that uses yards of weld-els
- We use a thin wall stainless steel Tial turbine housing that not only is very light, but also radiates significantly less heat than a thick cast hotside.
- We selected a thinner 70mm core which allows for much better airflow to the radiator. To avoid compromising intercooler efficiency though, we went with the tallest and widest core possible that doesn't require frame notching.
BTW, thought I'd add some food for thought. S2000 motor mounts can fail on completely bone stock S2000's, especially when the car sees autocross time. Depending on how you view things, having an upgraded motor mount included with your turbo system isn't such a bad idea.
Ok i may have over stated that aspect (boost spool up time). But comparing these directly i think we are to the point of spliting hairs. The sos may spool sooner mostly because of the extremly short runners more so than the divided housing. However the harsh 90 degree bends that are on the sos manifold do not promote quick up spool.
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Anyways, yes each have + and - about each. But i feel when your spending this much for one of these kits, it is a no brainer to get a ptuning. More for your buck imo.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
Toan,
Thank you for the reply on the motor mount photograph, I feel much better now. Im not sure I want to have my brand new Kpro compatable valve cover re-powder coated, perhaps Ill think about the black. Also, just a thought but I think you should add more info to your website about the turbo kit for the S2000. A close up picture of that jewelry welded exhaust manifold should be on there as well as the picture of the custom engine stand with the engine and turbo kit installed showing all of the detail of the kit. For such a piece of art work to be offered to buy, there is hardly any useful information available without coming to threads on S2ki.
Mr.60trim, I do not know if I will be the guenea pig on the 3576. Theoretically it should do better, but Ive was the pig with the SOS kit and I found out the hard way what can happen when you fork out the cash to try something different (but was tested to work great on other turbo kits). I highly recommend a call to Toan at Ptuning. I spoke to him for 1.5 hours a few weeks back about what I went through with the SOS kit and how the Ptuning kit is in comparison. To efficiently talk about the kit/kits it is much easier on the phone. Me personally, just from a pricing standpoint the entry level SOS kit is 5,766.xx and the entry level Ptuning kit is 5,995.xx, for 200 dollars more you get a heck of a lot more for your money.
Petwabit, I plan on making a purchase in spring time, depending on what I do.
Thank you for the reply on the motor mount photograph, I feel much better now. Im not sure I want to have my brand new Kpro compatable valve cover re-powder coated, perhaps Ill think about the black. Also, just a thought but I think you should add more info to your website about the turbo kit for the S2000. A close up picture of that jewelry welded exhaust manifold should be on there as well as the picture of the custom engine stand with the engine and turbo kit installed showing all of the detail of the kit. For such a piece of art work to be offered to buy, there is hardly any useful information available without coming to threads on S2ki.
Mr.60trim, I do not know if I will be the guenea pig on the 3576. Theoretically it should do better, but Ive was the pig with the SOS kit and I found out the hard way what can happen when you fork out the cash to try something different (but was tested to work great on other turbo kits). I highly recommend a call to Toan at Ptuning. I spoke to him for 1.5 hours a few weeks back about what I went through with the SOS kit and how the Ptuning kit is in comparison. To efficiently talk about the kit/kits it is much easier on the phone. Me personally, just from a pricing standpoint the entry level SOS kit is 5,766.xx and the entry level Ptuning kit is 5,995.xx, for 200 dollars more you get a heck of a lot more for your money.
Petwabit, I plan on making a purchase in spring time, depending on what I do.
Yes, Metros was our first track customer. We installed the first production PTUNING turbo system on his AP2 on a Wednesday and developed a dynotuned K-Pro map running 13.5 psi on a Thursday. He picked the car up on Friday and ran Saturday and Sunday events at Summit Point main using our oil cooler system and stock rediator. 30 minute HPDE sessions were no problem that weekend as the temps were cooler in the fall.
Even though he didn't have cooling issues in the fall, he opted to play it safe and upgrade to a Koyo radiator over the winter. He signed up for several HPDE events over the course of the next spring and summer. The weather in VA can easily get over 90 degrees with very high humidity during the hot summer months too.
Some things to note that may explain why we have had success running our turbo system on a road course.
- We have the lowest mounted turbo on the market. Less radiant heat into the engine compartment.
- Our short runner manifold radiates significantly less heat than a manifold that uses yards of weld-els
- We use a thin wall stainless steel Tial turbine housing that not only is very light, but also radiates significantly less heat than a thick cast hotside.
- We selected a thinner 70mm core which allows for much better airflow to the radiator. To avoid compromising intercooler efficiency though, we went with the tallest and widest core possible that doesn't require frame notching.
BTW, thought I'd add some food for thought. S2000 motor mounts can fail on completely bone stock S2000's, especially when the car sees autocross time. Depending on how you view things, having an upgraded motor mount included with your turbo system isn't such a bad idea.
Even though he didn't have cooling issues in the fall, he opted to play it safe and upgrade to a Koyo radiator over the winter. He signed up for several HPDE events over the course of the next spring and summer. The weather in VA can easily get over 90 degrees with very high humidity during the hot summer months too.
Some things to note that may explain why we have had success running our turbo system on a road course.
- We have the lowest mounted turbo on the market. Less radiant heat into the engine compartment.
- Our short runner manifold radiates significantly less heat than a manifold that uses yards of weld-els
- We use a thin wall stainless steel Tial turbine housing that not only is very light, but also radiates significantly less heat than a thick cast hotside.
- We selected a thinner 70mm core which allows for much better airflow to the radiator. To avoid compromising intercooler efficiency though, we went with the tallest and widest core possible that doesn't require frame notching.
BTW, thought I'd add some food for thought. S2000 motor mounts can fail on completely bone stock S2000's, especially when the car sees autocross time. Depending on how you view things, having an upgraded motor mount included with your turbo system isn't such a bad idea.

I agree with you on the OEM mounts, it's a fair point and perhaps not necessarily a con replacing it.
Mr.60trim,
I think the clear advantage of the Ptuning kit is power. A mini tubular w/ a merge collector will outflow and be more efficient than a log style like the SOS. Like I said, I think you can't go wrong with either kit, just depends what suits you.
For anyone planning on tracking there car often I think the best option is low side mount turbo. That narrows the choices down to only a handful of kits. For someone looking for a simple bolt on kit that offers super quick spool and 350-390 whp on pump gas I think the SOS kit is an excellent choice.
For me I am looking for a bolt on kit that requires minimal modifications, at least 400 whp on 94 oct and full boost by around 4,000rpm. I like SOS products but I think there current kit will have difficulties hitting 400whp on a GT30 sized turbo using pump gas. While the P-tunning kit has customers easily hitting 400-450whp on pump gas. I also really like P-tunnings ultra low mounting location design with their near straight downpipe. I mentioned the use of an EWG, oil scavenging pump, after motor mount and aftermarket rad fan as a design draw back over SOS. It is only a drawback when looking for the simplest most straight foward bolt in design. Otherwise they are merely differences in design, additions that were necessary to complete the kit to produce a specific result. At first glance I was not a fan of having to replace a factory motor mount, but Toan made a good point most people who auto x or track there car will eventually at some point need to replace the factory motor mounts. Lastly EWG's have always been the best option for boost control and I have always been a big fan of screamer pipes.
^ What he said.
RAIN H8R, I'm looking forward to your results and comparison.
I decided I'm going to hold off on going FI this spring and upgrade my suspension instead. I'm waiting to see more turbo kit results as well as some V-mount intercooler options to hit the market.
Toan,
I agree with RAIN H8R, I think the Ptunning website could use some revamping with some additional information on your awesome turbo kit. I was a bit disappointed by the website when I initially searched up the company. It is only here on S2ki that I found all the information I was looking for.
Question, would you guys consider producing or selling an optional drivers side motor mount? I could just order any aftermarket drivers side mount but I would prefer one that is the same durometer and look as the one that comes in your kit.
Also please push the idea of P-Tunning V-mount IC kit on your colleges.
I agree with RAIN H8R, I think the Ptunning website could use some revamping with some additional information on your awesome turbo kit. I was a bit disappointed by the website when I initially searched up the company. It is only here on S2ki that I found all the information I was looking for.
Question, would you guys consider producing or selling an optional drivers side motor mount? I could just order any aftermarket drivers side mount but I would prefer one that is the same durometer and look as the one that comes in your kit.
Also please push the idea of P-Tunning V-mount IC kit on your colleges.








