S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

PTUNING S2000 Turbo System (Pics, Dyno, Pricing)

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #771  
metros's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 4
From: NoVA
Default

^^^Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #772  
Sarek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,727
Likes: 0
From: Socal - SFV
Default

Originally Posted by metros,Nov 30 2010, 05:10 PM
^^^Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 04:29 PM
  #773  
dsddcd's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by GuardsRed,Nov 30 2010, 12:10 AM
Your data is completely wrong. unless somethings wrong with your car.

2.0 9:1 6262 bb will hit 10 psi by 4000ish rpms on the mase kit. would be even better if it was 11:1 compression or 2.2L
Trust me is it is correct, I am the only person I have ever met that calibrated their map sensor. I used multiple certified and calibrated digital and analog gauges and tested from 20" to 35PSI in at least 20 steps. Everyone just bolts them on and goes with the calibration sheet that comes with the sensor. I engineer and deliver equpment with pressure transducer that are worth 10 times what our MAP sensors cost and are more linear and acurate. Even they drift and must be checked and calibrated bianually at minimum.

Here is a post I put up trying to inform the boards on a more common issue than most know.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...&#entry19069299

The only other variable would be the RPM, but the data log straight from the EMS is better than any other source, remember it is driving the ignition and injector.

Finally, if you look at the graphs the boost and the power make a 1:1 corelation.

Oh, and there was nothing wrong with the car, it was making very healthy numbers for a concervative tune on 91 OCT. Now there may be something to say about usinng the boost controller at a high duty cylce to spool the turbo a bit faster but this also leads to overshoot and can cause control issues which I did not have or want.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #774  
GuardsRed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

didnt mase tune your car? im sure he has logs. ill ask him. but mine hits 10 psi by like 4100. according to my boost guage and aem log. mines a 6262bb .63 ar
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #775  
dsddcd's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

I do still have my data logs, which I would be happy to send, these are how I created the above graph and they were taken on the dyno using 5th gear.

Did you calibrate your MAP?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #776  
GuardsRed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dsddcd,Nov 30 2010, 08:15 PM
I do still have my data logs, which I would be happy to send, these are how I created the above graph and they were taken on the dyno using 5th gear.

Did you calibrate your MAP?
lol say no more. thats the problem right there. you did it on the dyno. not real life conditions.

go out on the street, 6th gear (the standard for spooling the turbo is highest gear low rpms. full throttle. then loggggg away). im willing to bet you are seeing close to 10 psi by 4000 prms even on a 2.0 w the 6262 on the mase kit.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #777  
s2000442's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 5
From: Midwest
Default

Originally Posted by GuardsRed,Nov 30 2010, 09:01 PM
lol say no more. thats the problem right there. you did it on the dyno. not real life conditions.

go out on the street, 6th gear (the standard for spooling the turbo is highest gear low rpms. full throttle. then loggggg away). im willing to bet you are seeing close to 10 psi by 4000 prms even on a 2.0 w the 6262 on the mase kit.
Well he would if he had the kit anymore I had the 5857bb mase kit and my kit spooled about the same as the 6262 and I had stock HG
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 03:08 AM
  #778  
HMFIC's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,386
Likes: 107
From: Right Here.
Default

yeap....i'm Definitely going to be taping up the tips and painting the muffler flat black fo sho
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #779  
EternalLx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by HMFIC,Dec 1 2010, 07:08 AM
yeap....i'm Definitely going to be taping up the tips and painting the muffler flat black fo sho

I had the same thought after those pics.
The tip could be bigger too
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #780  
s2000442's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 5
From: Midwest
Default

I disagree, I like the bling of the exhaust
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM.