S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Safest supercharger setup

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #21  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by SuzukaBlueAP2,Apr 7 2009, 10:32 AM
I my Comptech. I don't know about the current kit, under CT-engineering, but at least the former kits didn't void Honda's warranty if you had them install it or alter the kit in any way.
It is the number one kit with he most Honda support, but that doesnt mean there arent kits that are just as reliable these days, its just been around the longest and seems to be the most plentiful, if you want good suport and or if your looking to go used then likely Comptech will be the best choice. For these reasons it was for me. I was never planning to go more then 425whp anyway.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #22  
dsddcd's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

If you must go Supercharged (I Prefere Turbo's), then I would use the non aftecooled Vortech kit with the FMIC from Ultimate Racing. The new kit are self contained and very reliable, just don't expect much unless you use the KPro of AEM to tune. My feeling is that they shoot themselves in the foot with by using an FMU. Everybody gives Greddy Sh&# but at least they provided injectors and a piggy back.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #23  
ATOice's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 1
From: NJ/FL
Default

All options are fine....good tune and you are good to go. Your expectations can be met by any of them.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #24  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

Originally Posted by SuzukaBlueAP2,Apr 7 2009, 12:32 PM
I my Comptech. I don't know about the current kit, under CT-engineering, but at least the former kits didn't void Honda's warranty if you had them install it or alter the kit in any way.
No, they voided any powertrain section of the warranty. IF the dealer was willing to overlook the SC install they could defraud AHM and claim the car was un-modified. Or the Dealer that installed the Comptech kit took responsibility for the powertrain section of the warranty and didn't make a warranty claim with AHM, but repaired the car for there customer.

The same can be said of any SC or Turbo kit, not just a Comptech.

The grey area is some independent Honda dealers were Comptech dealers, who told the customer the car was under warranty because they installed it.

Anything that adds 100+ whp and can cause a powertrain failure is not covered by Honda's warranty.


Yes, I'm a dealer tech who gets to deal with warranty claims daily.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #25  
Nmatthews2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default

SO then for turbo go with a base greddy?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #26  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

sot/sxm roots blower hands down. power everywhere, smiles from ear to ear. my car tears ass and i am at 9.5psi. i should be near 370whp. right now, if not more. i love my kit, becuase even every day stop and go driving i have way more power then a centrifugal blower will ever have. just click my 8psi dyno, then compare to a dynoject centrifugal blowr dyno, and then revel in the low/midrange power and equal peak power!
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #27  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

low/mid power is for lazy shifters. You never see those rpms in a racing situation.

Besides roots and reliability is like an oxymoron
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:20 PM
  #28  
candymanjl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Apr 8 2009, 12:45 AM
low/mid power is for lazy shifters. You never see those rpms in a racing situation.
unless it's a track car you're in the "lazy shifter" range 99% of the time though it's nice to not have to downshift to accelerate

Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #29  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

[QUOTE=candymanjl,Apr 8 2009, 07:20 PM] unless it's a track car you're in the "lazy shifter" range 99% of the time though
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 01:02 AM
  #30  
Enlightened's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Apr 7 2009, 09:45 PM
low/mid power is for lazy shifters. You never see those rpms in a racing situation.

Besides roots and reliability is like an oxymoron
How is roots less reliable? More parasitic? Wouldn't you have to drive the car hard all the time to get less reliability?

Erik
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 PM.