S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Surveying the latest SC options

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #31  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,950
Likes: 474
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

james@barkerproducts.net


That was James email at one time. Maybe that will work.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 04:19 PM
  #32  
Habitforming's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 4
From: Northern KY
Default

I just wrote to both posted emails. Will let you know if/when I hear back and which one went through.

I hope support after purchase is faster than this.

What kind of MPG are you seeing in casual driving (this in no way impacts my decision - just casual curiosity)?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 04:52 PM
  #33  
jaundice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: McKinney, TX
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by jaundice' timestamp='1312857646' post='20859680
I have one of the original SOT kits. I will be installing it soon. I was looking for a stoplight racer in the S2000, so I have a stroked 2.4 liter motor and the SOT kit. I will be using KPro with it as well.
So traction/tires, diffs and trans are where most of your money will be going in the future from here on Should be a blast of a ride. I want to see some good 0-60 time posted from you.
Stage 2 Puddymod diff, AP2 transmission, 255 rear width RE-11 tires. Also with a Stage 4 CC clutch and flywheel. Should be fun....
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 05:55 PM
  #34  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Habitforming
also I just checked and the RC injectors I have are 440's. Will those be sufficient for the 350-400hp range?

If not... Anyone want to buy some RC 440's?
If you up the fuel pressure you might get to 350whp on those, you will need an adjustable fpr. I've got some 650cc for sale if you want something inexpensive that will support 400whp with the stock fpr.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 10:17 PM
  #35  
Habitforming's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 4
From: Northern KY
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by Habitforming' timestamp='1313175671' post='20872708
also I just checked and the RC injectors I have are 440's. Will those be sufficient for the 350-400hp range?

If not... Anyone want to buy some RC 440's?
If you up the fuel pressure you might get to 350whp on those, you will need an adjustable fpr. I've got some 650cc for sale if you want something inexpensive that will support 400whp with the stock fpr.
sending pm
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 11:33 PM
  #36  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Habitforming
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1313200529' post='20873822
[quote name='Habitforming' timestamp='1313175671' post='20872708']
also I just checked and the RC injectors I have are 440's. Will those be sufficient for the 350-400hp range?

If not... Anyone want to buy some RC 440's?
If you up the fuel pressure you might get to 350whp on those, you will need an adjustable fpr. I've got some 650cc for sale if you want something inexpensive that will support 400whp with the stock fpr.
sending pm
[/quote]

replied
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #37  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,950
Likes: 474
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by Habitforming
What kind of MPG are you seeing in casual driving (this in no way impacts my decision - just casual curiosity)?

My last tanks was 24 mpg. I usually get 22-23. My driving style is usually a steady cruise and not leadfooted on the freeway, but I do like to wind out first and second from a stop all the time when no one is in front of me because that is where I get my fun. Even on my first couple tanks when I was wringing it out everywhere when the kit was new I think I got 21. I think if it were fine tuned a little I could do better, but I am using the Emanage basemap I got with the kit. Mark tuned it to run set AFR off of a wideband but it runs a little rich when hot.

If you live in a warm climate I would HIGHLY reccomend a NACA duct in the hood like a couple people have done or some other creative solution. I am cooking up a couple things to try out when I have the time to tinker with the intake and get it some cooler air.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 02:44 PM
  #38  
Habitforming's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 4
From: Northern KY
Default

Originally Posted by vader1
Originally Posted by Habitforming' timestamp='1313194745' post='20873664

What kind of MPG are you seeing in casual driving (this in no way impacts my decision - just casual curiosity)?

My last tanks was 24 mpg. I usually get 22-23. My driving style is usually a steady cruise and not leadfooted on the freeway, but I do like to wind out first and second from a stop all the time when no one is in front of me because that is where I get my fun. Even on my first couple tanks when I was wringing it out everywhere when the kit was new I think I got 21. I think if it were fine tuned a little I could do better, but I am using the Emanage basemap I got with the kit. Mark tuned it to run set AFR off of a wideband but it runs a little rich when hot.

If you live in a warm climate I would HIGHLY reccomend a NACA duct in the hood like a couple people have done or some other creative solution. I am cooking up a couple things to try out when I have the time to tinker with the intake and get it some cooler air.
Hah, that's better than I get currently in each driving cycle.

The hottest it ever gets around here is 100F, but that's pretty rare. And I usually don't drive it when it's that hot out anyway.

Can you route air to it via the fender? I wouldn't completely be against the naca duct, but I like to stay as stealthy as I can. Is everyone so far just using the original filter placement?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #39  
neptuner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Wetumpka, Alabama
Default

I ran the original air filter location for a while then changed it a little because the filter was rubbing on the firewall. Eventually I built a box around the filter and mounted an NACA duct thru the hood to feed the box. Very similar to the way WLaurent did his.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #40  
Habitforming's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 4
From: Northern KY
Default

Originally Posted by neptuner
I ran the original air filter location for a while then changed it a little because the filter was rubbing on the firewall. Eventually I built a box around the filter and mounted an NACA duct thru the hood to feed the box. Very similar to the way WLaurent did his.
do you have pics or links to a thread about it?

EDIT: never mind, forgot the search function is actually useful these days
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM.