S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Vortech Aftercooler question....

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #11  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

Originally Posted by 305s2k,Aug 5 2010, 01:38 PM
I believe a set up like this would benefit by having a larger reservoir tank than the one vortech provides for increased coolant capacity, as well as a larger pump to move more fluid.
I tried a larger/faster pump and it actually hurt cooling efficiency. The water needs to have some residence time in the heat exchanger.

This is the pump recommended by PWR.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
305s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by WLAURENT,Aug 5 2010, 02:48 PM
I tried a larger/faster pump and it actually hurt cooling efficiency. The water needs to have some residence time in the heat exchanger.

This is the pump recommended by PWR.
Thats interesting, but it does make sense... What about a larger reservoir tank? Wouldnt something with more capacity be better?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #13  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

Originally Posted by 305s2k,Aug 5 2010, 04:23 PM
Thats interesting, but it does make sense... What about a larger reservoir tank? Wouldnt something with more capacity be better?
Not sure - I have not tested it. I have talked in detail with PWR and they do not typically recommend one unless you are planning to ice the water for short term usage.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 10:12 AM
  #14  
CRVRX's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 490
Likes: 5
Default

We have building the Intercooler for the Jackson supercharger for a few years now. We lots of R+D I found the 2 to 2.5 GPM was about the best results. Too fast and the heat exchanger doesn't have enough time to do it's job and to slow the liquid gets too hot...etc..
I also found reservoirs are just extra volume to transfer heat, of course the bigger the heat exchanger the better. I'm going to building another turbo kit for my using a Water to air design like our JR IC manifolds and I can do a real world back to back test.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #15  
donaldmejr's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by CRVRX,Aug 6 2010, 10:12 AM
We have building the Intercooler for the Jackson supercharger for a few years now. We lots of R+D I found the 2 to 2.5 GPM was about the best results. Too fast and the heat exchanger doesn't have enough time to do it's job and to slow the liquid gets too hot...etc..
I also found reservoirs are just extra volume to transfer heat, of course the bigger the heat exchanger the better. I'm going to building another turbo kit for my using a Water to air design like our JR IC manifolds and I can do a real world back to back test.
HI LHT!!! I have your manifold on my B20 JRSC and LOVE IT!!!
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #16  
CRVRX's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 490
Likes: 5
Default

Great, My plans are to have a similar manifold for my S2000 real soon
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VTECSTYLE
S2000 Forced Induction
3
Jul 2, 2010 11:22 PM
BlownAP
S2000 Forced Induction
1
Jan 24, 2007 01:28 PM
JDM S2000
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Jul 25, 2006 08:32 PM
Nick32
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Mar 27, 2006 06:07 PM
bjc8201
S2000 Talk
13
Oct 25, 2003 11:20 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 PM.