Pic Request for 17" fronts and 18" rear
That pic looks a little bizzare, the rims are kind of ... cloudy.....
From the side I think it looks weird unless you have some coilovers to even out the rake a little bit, but it does look mean from the front.
From the side I think it looks weird unless you have some coilovers to even out the rake a little bit, but it does look mean from the front.
Originally Posted by zbrewha863,Feb 28 2007, 08:26 PM
That pic looks a little bizzare, the rims are kind of ... cloudy.....
From the side I think it looks weird unless you have some coilovers to even out the rake a little bit, but it does look mean from the front.
From the side I think it looks weird unless you have some coilovers to even out the rake a little bit, but it does look mean from the front.
the car does have coilovers(tein flex)....and i purposely set it up that way.
i have other pics of the car fully slammed even the rear...but my photobucket is trippin.
they do it because the sidewall size compared to load on the front vs. rear.
on the s2k with the front/rear bias you need the same size sidewall all around for ideal handling. which means a 25" tire on matching rims
on the s2k with the front/rear bias you need the same size sidewall all around for ideal handling. which means a 25" tire on matching rims
Originally Posted by ap2 jared,Mar 5 2007, 03:06 AM
heres more..




Originally Posted by s20oo,Mar 6 2007, 08:31 AM
I never noticed until now that you were running different size wheels front to rear. May i ask what size tires? Looks great, you don't notice a difference in handling with that setup do you?
yoko es100 205/50 frnt
245/40/17 rear
no i cant say i notice a difference...just because i rarely drive on the wheels. they sit in my garage. i have other wheels i drive daily.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
problem_child
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
3
Oct 14, 2008 06:23 PM




