S2000 Modifications and Parts Discussions about aftermarket products and parts including reviews, information and opinion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Intake idea

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 21, 2014 | 06:15 AM
  #21  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by J Schmidt
Originally Posted by Gernby
The Y pipe would effectively shorten the intake length, which would change the torque curve. On the S2000, intake tube length has a very significant impact on performance, so you would need to do quite a bit of testing to figure out the right layout.
Do you consider snorkels to change intake length?
The "intake length" is mostly determined by the length of the tube from the TB to the filter and / or filter box. Any length after that is pretty meaningless.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2014 | 10:05 AM
  #22  
AP1Driver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
The S2000's motor isn't even limited by one intake filter. Adding a second one is pointless (especially if it's sucking up hot under-hood air). You only really see filter setups like this on large V8s and V10s which move a huge quantity of air.
It's obvious that you didn't read any previous posts in this thread :face palm:
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #23  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by AP1Driver
Originally Posted by deepbluejh
The S2000's motor isn't even limited by one intake filter. Adding a second one is pointless (especially if it's sucking up hot under-hood air). You only really see filter setups like this on large V8s and V10s which move a huge quantity of air.
It's obvious that you didn't read any previous posts in this thread :face palm:
Uh, I read your original post. I guess if you want intake bling, then go for it. Don't expect much (if any) power from it though. I'm sorry if that wasn't the answer you wanted. Even well developed intakes make almost no power on this car. It's also worth noting that no well developed intakes for this car have two air filters.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2014 | 05:54 PM
  #24  
photosbyms's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

From an engineering perspective, there's no laminar flow with that type of setup. Where the fork meets, the air will unnecessarily experience turbulence before tightening down to one path.

Air flows like a liquid. Minimize the sloshing. CAI's don't appreciably improve performance in this particular car, but if you're going to design an intake based on performance, the best designed intake will route cold air smoothly. Long tube intakes accomplish this. Ram intakes, while shorter, minimize turbulence/resistance.

Then you also have to clean two filters. So cost.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 07:58 AM
  #25  
AP1Driver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
Uh, I read your original post. I guess if you want intake bling, then go for it. Don't expect much (if any) power from it though. I'm sorry if that wasn't the answer you wanted. Even well developed intakes make almost no power on this car. It's also worth noting that no well developed intakes for this car have two air filters.
And it's still obvious; I've stated multiple times in this thread that I'm not looking for a power increase.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 06:28 AM
  #26  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 1,859
Default

Originally Posted by Jdrum1
The air is going to travel the path of least resistance, so if everything about each path isn9t exactly the same, I think you9ll end up with one functioning filter and one for aesthetics.
Path of least resistance is not typically all or nothing. Even if his piping wasn't perfectly symmetrical, and even if other factors came into play (less external airflow to one side vs the other), there would still likely be significant flow to the weaker side. Least resistance side would just get more flow, not all the flow.

Of course, I'm not claiming therefore this will affect performance positivly or negatively, as we don't know yet. And that is not what this thread is about.

What it is about is someones idea for a unique looking engine bay. While that is not my thing, I respect and encourage the OP to persue it, since it is his thing. So I'm not getting all the negative vibes from so many responders here. I especially find this sort of thing irritating when its obvious the bandwagon didn't read most of the posts in the thread.

On this forum you have to be very careful what you write in the first post of a new thread, because that is all so many read before they respond.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vtec9
S2000 Under The Hood
0
May 27, 2014 09:36 AM
bnag0
S2000 Modifications and Parts
3
Mar 24, 2012 08:56 AM
Lpfan8278
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
28
Jul 9, 2010 09:04 AM
rikhemi
S2000 Talk
14
Oct 5, 2006 04:31 PM
Speedy_G77
S2000 Under The Hood
14
Dec 20, 2005 09:47 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 PM.