Myth Busting
02-06-2008, 10:39 AM
#61
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vik2000,Feb 6 2008, 11:10 AM
^Hm.... that seems to clear the myth?
70mm = max power at all rpms and max niose
60/63mm = good power at all rpms and slightly less noise than 70
Myth over.
02-06-2008, 11:54 AM
#62
Taking the time to depict our statments has no bennifit to me and therefor not worth the energy. I respect your input and agree on some of your point. I think what its coming down to is prefrence on the performance these offer.
The reason I say the car is not stock is because of the level of power it is putting out considering the gain it is showing, its clearly not starting out as base power output, therefor the exhaust efficiency in a bigger mm is allowed to strt becoming for effciant. we don't know if thic car has a header and what size, or has an intake with a vfac or what. We will just have to agree to disagree that my claim that the 60-63 makes more power earlier in the power band on a stock platform.
The reason I say the car is not stock is because of the level of power it is putting out considering the gain it is showing, its clearly not starting out as base power output, therefor the exhaust efficiency in a bigger mm is allowed to strt becoming for effciant. we don't know if thic car has a header and what size, or has an intake with a vfac or what. We will just have to agree to disagree that my claim that the 60-63 makes more power earlier in the power band on a stock platform.
02-06-2008, 12:53 PM
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sheppard AFB, Texas
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PrOsPeCt S,Feb 1 2008, 01:29 PM
hey guys i have an 07 with berk tp and HKS, k&n drop in and Next Gear intake manifold gasket. and when i first got my car my base pass was 222rwhp and 150ftlbs. i dynoed mine yesterday again with all that i mentioned above, and the final numbers were 238.6whp and 151ftlbs with the A/F at 14.5 up top.
some may not belive this but thats what it read.
it was on a dyno dynamics.
what do you guys think?
some may not belive this but thats what it read.
it was on a dyno dynamics.
what do you guys think?
Any experts want to chime in re: day-to-day variability of the same Dyno (due to temp, humidity, etc)?.
02-06-2008, 01:08 PM
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 12:54 PM
Taking the time to depict our statments has no bennifit to me and therefor not worth the energy. I respect your input and agree on some of your point. I think what its coming down to is prefrence on the performance these offer.
), there is a lot of logic that apparently you aren't getting. Or just choosing not to respond to...There is no "preference" if you just want max power: The 70 makes more at all rpms, period. If you're talking about power/sound/price/looks/etc, then yes there's a lot of variables and "preference" is the key word...but that's not what we're talking about is it
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 12:54 PM
The reason I say the car is not stock is because of the level of power it is putting out considering the gain it is showing, its clearly not starting out as base power output, therefor the exhaust efficiency in a bigger mm is allowed to strt becoming for effciant. we don't know if thic car has a header and what size, or has an intake with a vfac or what. We will just have to agree to disagree that my claim that the 60-63 makes more power earlier in the power band on a stock platform.
I'll end this post with the same request for a same car/day/mod dyno proving otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post