Myth Busting
I honestly don't know. I mean I just keep hearing HKS powerloss. Even in the most recent thread about Invidia Exhaust: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=564354
Scroll down and you'll see tylorweaver saying 4 of his friends lost power with HKS over stock and there's dyno too.
Scroll down and you'll see tylorweaver saying 4 of his friends lost power with HKS over stock and there's dyno too.
Originally Posted by PrOsPeCt S,Feb 1 2008, 01:29 PM
hey guys i have an 07 with berk tp and HKS, k&n drop in and Next Gear intake manifold gasket. and when i first got my car my base pass was 222rwhp and 150ftlbs. i dynoed mine yesterday again with all that i mentioned above, and the final numbers were 238.6whp and 151ftlbs with the A/F at 14.5 up top.
some may not belive this but thats what it read.
it was on a dyno dynamics.
what do you guys think?
some may not belive this but thats what it read.
it was on a dyno dynamics.
what do you guys think?
Yeah its believable. Dyno Jet reads lower so your actual power is closer to the upper 220's And Dyno jet is the standard we all go by when comparing numbers.
In an N/A application the 60mm and 63mm makes power throughout the entire rpm range. The 70mm, though makes a little more, only makes it in the upper rpm range. About 7500rpm and above. The more supporting mods you have to bring your engine power and efficiancy up, the more benificial the 70mm will become. FI yes. In N/A however, you can bring up your other supporting mods to produce the magical 230whp with a 60mm, but have a fatter trq curve as well say over a 230whp 70mm with less suporting mods. Its all bout the exhaust pulse or force your engine can produce to fill the exhaust mm area without creating turbulence. To much area to fill up a 70mm at lower/mid rpm so it is only useful in a drag race application where a more peaky characteristic isn't a hinderence since WOT at all times. 63mm FTW if you street and track.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 5 2008, 11:53 PM
In an N/A application the 60mm and 63mm makes power throughout the entire rpm range. The 70mm, though makes a little more, only makes it in the upper rpm range. About 7500rpm and above. The more supporting mods you have to bring your engine power and efficiancy up, the more benificial the 70mm will become. FI yes. In N/A however, you can bring up your other supporting mods to produce the magical 230whp with a 60mm, but have a fatter trq curve as well say over a 230whp 70mm with less suporting mods. Its all bout the exhaust pulse or force your engine can produce to fill the exhaust mm area without creating turbulence. To much area to fill up a 70mm at lower/mid rpm so it is only useful in a drag race application where a more peaky characteristic isn't a hinderence since WOT at all times. 63mm FTW if you street and track.
70mm exhausts make more power across the entire rpm range, equating to more usable power everywhere.
Direct comparison of T1R 70mm to T1R 63mm below. Note that both blue lines are above both red lines across the entire rpm range:
This is amplified for FI applications and/or with mods.
Feel free to show an actual dyno of a direct 70mm to 63mm comparison where the 63mm makes more hp or tq down low as you suggest.
Myth busted.
From the same thread you got the above dyno.
T1R 70R & 63 Sparrow (63 cat-back dual / 70R header back dual)
- made out of SUS304 aircraft stainless
- 63S designed for NA to improve acceleration and mid-range power
- 70R designed for NA tuned or FI engine setup
- 63S weighs 28 lbs / 70R weighs 33 lbs
- 70R comes with O2 Fix and detachable test pipe so youu can bolt your stock catalytic convertor back on anytime
- Dynoproven +5whp for 63S / +13whp for 70R
I think the main point here is that both of these exhaust's are proven to increase hp compared to some other exhausts.
T1R 70R & 63 Sparrow (63 cat-back dual / 70R header back dual)
- made out of SUS304 aircraft stainless
- 63S designed for NA to improve acceleration and mid-range power
- 70R designed for NA tuned or FI engine setup
- 63S weighs 28 lbs / 70R weighs 33 lbs
- 70R comes with O2 Fix and detachable test pipe so youu can bolt your stock catalytic convertor back on anytime
- Dynoproven +5whp for 63S / +13whp for 70R
I think the main point here is that both of these exhaust's are proven to increase hp compared to some other exhausts.
I'm not trying to argue here, but your post makes my head hurt...
Show me where it says they are not stock. And regardless, it is the same car, back to back, so the mods (if they exist) are no longer a variable.
And yes, the difference between the two is more noticeable up top. As it should be. The point remains that the 70 is still making more power down low (and everywhere).
Already did that...see above.
I can agrue it because not only are you wrong, what you're saying makes no sense:
A more noticeable improvement? The more power an exhaust makes, the more noticeable the improvement will be. The 70 makes more power at all rpms! It doesnt get any simpler than that.
What facts? You have stated your opinion, unsubstantiated. I am a degreed mechanical engineer and know all about how exhausts work, thank you.
The 70 is better for power. At all rpms. Period. The dyno above proves just that.
Of course there is more to it than just saying "The 70 makes more power" because usually people who say this are only looking at peak power. That's why I qualify every one of these statements I make with "...at every rpm." Because it makes more power at every rpm, the total area under the power curve is absolutely, positively, unarguably greater than that of a 60/63. Therefore, the 70 truly is better for power.
Again, I welcome any same car/day/mod dynos proving me wrong.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
If you notice the power curve on the 70mm starts to creep in about 5000rpm, but really makes an improvement in the higher rpm starting after vtec, these cars are also not stock, they have other supporting mods which I mentioned as a factor in capitolizing on the bigger piping.
And yes, the difference between the two is more noticeable up top. As it should be. The point remains that the 70 is still making more power down low (and everywhere).
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
What you need to do is find a dyno sheet of two stock cars, one with the 60 or 63mm and one with the 70mm. And you will see my point more clearly.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
I will state again, if you want noticable improvment throughout the entire rpm range and better low end response/trq, go with the smaller 60mm. If you wan't a peakier power band with slightly more on top go with the 70mm. Its simple really, you can't really argue this if you know what all the variables are.
A more noticeable improvement? The more power an exhaust makes, the more noticeable the improvement will be. The 70 makes more power at all rpms! It doesnt get any simpler than that.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
Regaurdless my post is valid, if you want to fight over a few thousand rpm, its your perogative. Generally speaking this is how exhaust works on our car. Its not just a therory, its based on some facts.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
My point is you simply can't say 70mm is better then a 60mm which allot of people tend to do when they don't understand why or at what rpm.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 6 2008, 09:17 AM
They simply say it makes more power, but there is more to it then this as I know you are aware of on some level. I think I touched on the points well enough in my first post.
Again, I welcome any same car/day/mod dynos proving me wrong.








