is their any gear between 4.44 and stock? if so is it even worth it?

 

j's racing makes 4.30 but its a bit pricey, and you might as well get the 4.44s. You get good performance, no loss of top speed, and finishes the quarter mile right at the end of 4th.

 

well there is loss of top speed you cant really say there is none.. is there a thread of gear comparison? as far as strength/durability? and overall top speed loss? i dont want to jack this thread

 

You'll spend way more money NA than SC to get 1/2 the results.

 

I think N/a tunning is more for the spirit of the car if you are concerned about numbers, N/A is the wrong way to go. I am running the BC Stage 2 cams and their Ti valvetrain. don't have any numbers but the car does feels like it has more power. Please no negative commits to me I ve heard enough. And just putting my input in.

 

You will still be drag limited with the 4.44s and have the same top sped as the 4.10s. But you will get there a lot faster. The 4.56 and up will be gear limited.

 

So did you see a big difference with cams alot say its not worth it but tell me what you think. You can pm if you want.

 

the BC cams have been proven to lose power vs stock cams, BC had to give all the customers full refunds, LOL.......

the RIGHT cams will be worth it, it just sucks that the RIGHT cams are being made by a company that is.......hmmm....... slow?

 

Just so you know brian crower (BC) had to refund every camshaft that was sold for the s2000 when every single dyno of them lost power or caused valvetrain damage. Any power you might feel with installing aftermarket camshafts is strictly the placebo effect. Save your money, do some research if youd like it its a pretty well known fact.

 

Who is suppose to be coming out with the right cams? Spoon?