S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

Skunk2 Megapower header

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-13-2011, 09:58 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
FUGITIVEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it was Honda Tuning that posted the Dyno Video on facebook but still no numbers. I have no idea when they are going to release it but I think it's going to be a test and tune article in their mag soon.
Old 10-13-2011, 12:47 PM
  #22  
Registered User

 
HvRRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,645
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

it's already available on evasives site..
Old 10-13-2011, 03:38 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
twinpnoy84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wanna see some dynos on this. Maybe on the next honda tuning magazine =)
Old 10-13-2011, 03:56 PM
  #24  
Sponsor

 
Urge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 2,465
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I sent a note to Skunk to test vs Stock & Hytech headers on a Stock and Fully Built engines lined up on the dyno..

Lets see if they respond..
__________________


Old 10-13-2011, 04:44 PM
  #25  

 
neurotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gernby
The OEM design is a standard Tri-Y with a better configuration. The thing that I believe is bad about designs like this one (and Hytech's) is that they are pairing cylinders 3 and 4 together and 1 and 2 together. By doing this, the pulse from cylinder 3 at the secondary merge collector will cause scavenging on cylinder 3 and 4. However, the pulse from cylinder 4 will only cause scavenging on itself. The same will happen with the pulse from cylinder 2, so cylinder 1 will also get 2 scavenging pulses. So at the engine RPM where scavenging is at its peak, cylinders 1 and 4 are going to run significantly different than 2 and 3. Ignition timing and fuel would really need to be independently tuned for peak performance and reliability, but I don't think any EMS allows separate maps for 2 cylinders. If you just try to use individual cylinder trims to add a few percent more fuel and retard timing a couple degrees on cylinders 1 and 4, that would be safer, but you would be loosing performance at the lower RPMs where 1 and 4 aren't getting double scavenging.
A correction on header pairings:

Skunk2: 1-2, 3-4 pairings
Hytech: 1-3, 2-4 pairings (typical for other applications)
Others: 1-4, 2-3 pairings (typical and OEM S2000 application)

Skunk2:


Hytech:


Other (well, Toda but it's the typical (OE) pairing:
Old 10-13-2011, 05:08 PM
  #26  
Former Sponsor
 
Gernby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I agree that the cylinder pairings are technically different between the Hytech and Skunk2, but the problem is the same. Since the firing order is 1-3-4-2, the only way to have even scavenging across all 4 cylinders is to pair 1 and 4 together and 2 and 3 together. The Skunk2 pairing causes double scavenging on cylinders 1 and 4, and the Hytech pairing causes double scavenging on cylinders 2 and 3. However, the double scavenging only happens above a certain RPM. What I forgot to mention is that below that RPM, double reversion occurs on those 2 cylinders! Basically, the Skunk2 header will cause cylinders 1 and 4 to run very rich at low RPMs and very lean at high RPMs.The Hytech header will do the same on cylinders 2 and 3.
Old 10-13-2011, 05:12 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Hirevs2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

someone buy this thing and put on the dyno! thanks.
Old 10-13-2011, 07:13 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
H8BOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yikes I am not sure about this. I am in the market for a new header but leaning more towards the 5zigen but this is sparking a little interest.
Old 10-13-2011, 08:23 PM
  #29  

 
jh4db536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

stock header(tuned) + tp/exh vs skunk2 header (tuned) + tp/exh vs hytech header (tuned) + tp/exh

Ap1 and Ap2

Would love to see dynos by independent 3rd party

Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
Old 10-13-2011, 10:35 PM
  #30  

 
06Estukay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,439
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hytech and Skunk2 pairings are different, but the concept is identical. Both are designed to be sequentially fired.

1&2, 3&4 pairing = 1&3, 2&4 pairing.

I'm too lazy to type. See section 4 at: http://www.team-integra.net/forum/bl...ine-power.html. Cole's notes: SMSP, Hytech, and Endyn agree that sequential firing is the best design for a tri-y header, where ultimate power is concerned. It always made sense to me, and I've always wondered why no one else besides hytech came out with a sequentially fired header up until now. P.s. wasn't fast forward experimenting with sequentially fired header designs?

Anyhow, this looks interesting. Can't wait to see some proper dyno testing.


Quick Reply: Skunk2 Megapower header



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 AM.