S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

DavePK's OpenSource brake system design

Thread Tools
 
Old May 30, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #61  
Nobody's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default

From a 3 year old article on Mercedes vs. Porsche's introduction of Ceramic-Composite Brakes:

In addition, the PCCB discs are coupled with all-new metallic pads that develop extremely high and very constant friction during deceleration; brake temperature becomes a minor factor because the PCCB provides fade-free braking almost regardless of how hot the rotors become. Wet-braking capability also is improved because the new brake linings do not absorb water as conventional linings do.

Full Article:
http://waw.wardsauto.com/ar/auto_designer_braking/
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #62  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

yeah I don;'t think ceramic is required tho. Just a properly sized metal one should work well and cost much less.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #63  
SR71BB's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 0
From: ghettoville, abq, nm
Default

Originally posted by krazik
IMO A properly designed system shouldn't fade, especially in a 30 minute session.
I'll assume you are referring to a properly ducted system, too. I think everyone here has forgotten that the mass/heat capacity of the rotor is offset by the need to keep unsprung weight as light as possible. A properly designed system fades on the last lap in the last corner

And yes, Schuey and other experience brake fade, especially when running on full tanks.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #64  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

you do have a point, but most of us don't have the budget of schuey to redesign my brakes for each track day, I'd error on the side of more mass to than less. Gives you the largest possiblities for all tracks.

Ducting/Cooling is definately key too.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #65  
RT's Avatar
RT
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,269
Likes: 42
From: Redmond, WA
Default

Dave, any pics or part numbers for the rotor hats? (the cheaper ones )
BTW, Whoa, nice thread, I think my head hurts!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:52 PM
  #66  
MadDane's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Monterey
Default

Any updates Dave?!?!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #67  
davepk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

Sorry for the long delay in updates. Its been slow going the last couple months.

Well I got the fronts complete and in working order and got a chance to try them out at the new fernly/Reno track.
They seemed to work quite well. Very good pedal feel and absolutely no fade. But then that was to be expected as the fernly track is very easy on the brakes. Only one really hard braking zone in the current configuration. When I got the car back home I tore the front brakes down for inspection. Turns out the the lower ball joint protudes further out than I thought when the suspension is compressed. Doh! This resulted the casting rubbing up againt the rotor until the cast was shaved enough to no longer rub. I have since taken a die grinder to the casting to generate a little more clearance. See the pics below. If this continues to be an issue I'll have to increase clearance by redesing the brackets etc. I might also have to install longer lug nuts as well. For now I'll continue to test it as is.

I'm currently making brackets for my new rear brakes. I'll be using the rotor and hats from my Pinnacle setup (12.2" dia 0.81" thick rotors) along with an Outlaw 2000 caliper. I currently have no plan to keep the ebrake, hopefully that doesn't become a problem.

I should be receiving parts early this week that will let me complete Phase two, dual side by side master cylinders. I hope to have all of this put together by the end of this week but who knows. Either way I'm planning on bringing it to SOW early Aug with SV to do some testing of the new setup.





Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 04:22 PM
  #68  
MadDane's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Monterey
Default

Nice Dave! I'm really impressed! Can't wait to hear how it works out at SOW. Thanks for keeping us in the loop!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 04:59 PM
  #69  
slick rick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
From: la
Default

I thought you were trying to go with 1.25" rotors. What happened?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #70  
davepk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

The rotors on the front are 1.25"... Its the new rotors for the rear that are 0.81"
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM.