Forgestar F14 17x10, data thread
#301
I wasn't able to see what forgestar makes their wheels from on their site, but it appears that they're all flow-formed wheels. Presumably, they're A356 or something similar. The interesting thing about the flow-forming technique is that it will have essentially no effect on the strength of the wheel in areas where they don't deform it (the hubs/spokes/face of the wheel all appear to be initially cast). the strengthened area will be limited to the barrel. This is dramatically different to machining wheels from forged blanks (as is done with the higher end HRE wheels), where the whole wheel will be relatively homogeneously strong.
From what i can tell in literature, heat effects on A356 alloys isn't actually as big a deal on fatigue performance as you'd expect. The 'runout' stress (stress at which the material fails at 10,000,000 loading/unloading cycles) is essentially the same in the as-cast and the heat treated condition. This alloy IS heat treatable, but fatigue life is really hurt by other things like casting defects.
From what i can tell in literature, heat effects on A356 alloys isn't actually as big a deal on fatigue performance as you'd expect. The 'runout' stress (stress at which the material fails at 10,000,000 loading/unloading cycles) is essentially the same in the as-cast and the heat treated condition. This alloy IS heat treatable, but fatigue life is really hurt by other things like casting defects.
#302
From what i can tell in literature, heat effects on A356 alloys isn't actually as big a deal on fatigue performance as you'd expect. The 'runout' stress (stress at which the material fails at 10,000,000 loading/unloading cycles) is essentially the same in the as-cast and the heat treated condition.
Just because the material does not have a large fatigue life delta between heat treated and annealed condition does not mean that its fatigue life at the elevated temperature is not much lower than at room temp. The issue at play here IMO is that the very hot rotors are heating the material past it's usuable limit. That also explains why many heavier cars have used F14 successfully as they have much larger, cooler brakes.
#303
Edit: nevermind. Brain fart. If the damage was done when it was on the rear, then swapping the wheel to the front could cover up a rear brake temp issue. So, who's going to measure the rotor/wheel temps for us on a hot stock rear setup?
#304
Seems like there are more than a few s2k track cars with similar set ups driving under similar conditions on these wheels now. So does this mean the expectation of these wheels is less than 15 track days? Could it be a casting defect even thoug all 4 wheels showed cracks? I can't think of any situation that would lead to me buying these. I never even bent my RPF1s and they had about 30 track days. I understand wheels can fail but this seems beyond reason. If I'm wrong help me understand why...
EDIT: IF CHRIS' SUSPENSION WAS STILL BOTTOMING OUT THAN ITS REASONABLE THAT ANY WHEEL WOULD FAIL.
EDIT: IF CHRIS' SUSPENSION WAS STILL BOTTOMING OUT THAN ITS REASONABLE THAT ANY WHEEL WOULD FAIL.
#305
Seems like there are more than a few s2k track cars with similar set ups driving under similar conditions on these wheels now. So does this mean the expectation of these wheels is less than 15 track days? Could it be a casting defect even though all 4 wheels showed cracks? I can't think of any situation that would lead to me buying these. I never even bent my RPF1s and they had about 30 track days. I understand wheels can fail but this seems beyond reason. If I'm wrong help me understand why...
#306
That's true, although I wouldn't expect the delta to change that much. That's beyond my area of expertise for now though. From what i read, it was just the rear brakes that run really hot, whereas the fronts run cooler (I don't know never tracked my car). The fact that a front wheel failed made it seemed like it wasn't an elevated operating temperature issue.
Edit: nevermind. Brain fart. If the damage was done when it was on the rear, then swapping the wheel to the front could cover up a rear brake temp issue. So, who's going to measure the rotor/wheel temps for us on a hot stock rear setup?
Edit: nevermind. Brain fart. If the damage was done when it was on the rear, then swapping the wheel to the front could cover up a rear brake temp issue. So, who's going to measure the rotor/wheel temps for us on a hot stock rear setup?
A356 Material Properties
#308
Originally Posted by HotMess' timestamp='1460669939' post='23938438
That's true, although I wouldn't expect the delta to change that much. That's beyond my area of expertise for now though. From what i read, it was just the rear brakes that run really hot, whereas the fronts run cooler (I don't know never tracked my car). The fact that a front wheel failed made it seemed like it wasn't an elevated operating temperature issue.
Edit: nevermind. Brain fart. If the damage was done when it was on the rear, then swapping the wheel to the front could cover up a rear brake temp issue. So, who's going to measure the rotor/wheel temps for us on a hot stock rear setup?
Edit: nevermind. Brain fart. If the damage was done when it was on the rear, then swapping the wheel to the front could cover up a rear brake temp issue. So, who's going to measure the rotor/wheel temps for us on a hot stock rear setup?
A356 Material Properties
#309
Registered User
Just a quick opinion. I suspect it's a design of the wheel, quality of the material, quality of the casting process, and possibly how it was powdercoated (prepping is important).
On a more controversial note, maybe thepoi is so fast that he's putting too much stress for these wheels to handle.
On a more controversial note, maybe thepoi is so fast that he's putting too much stress for these wheels to handle.