S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

KW Variant 3 Settings?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #181  
robi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

BIlly EXCELLENT post! I've been lurking lol.and someone used my name so ....just to complete the picture the "no preload coilovers" have no preload only in full droop...as soon as you set it down the spring compresses to it's static weight setting...(just like the V3's)...oh you want to cornerweight the car too...ok to add weight you need to adjust the "body" up this ADDS preload on that corner and TAKES preload from all other corners...so the term preload applies to ALL suspension systems equally. Some have longer travel and are designed both in stroke and droop for each car they are tested on...some just "fit" the chassis... clevis part from column "A" damper from bin "C" topmount from supplier "D" (in orange please)........the No preload system can work the biggest problem I see is they even make all the parts smaller/shorter and keep the oil bath th the absolute minimum...they can be lighter...but lack the travel imo...ymmv...
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #182  
Billj747's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 25
From: SoFlo
Default

Damn it Robi...

Yes the asian coilovers enable the spring to be 'preloaded' in full droop. I agree all suspension is 'preloaded' once you put the car on teh ground and the weight of the car sits on the spring. BUT, most people talk about 'preload' -in preloading the spring in full droop.

An easier way to view it is simply, the spring perch determines the height the spring sits on (and thus the car sitting on the spring). If you look at it from that perspective it is much simpler than from the perspective of 'increasing preload' (raising ride height) by fighting the force of the spring and car's weight by pre-loading the spring even more to raise the car.

Just say raise the spring perch - and thus ride height.

Maybe I just really don't like how the word 'preload' is thrown around by many people who don't fully understand what they are commenting on.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #183  
robi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

u r preaching to the converted ;-)

and my example moves the spring perch higher...as measured from the lower suspension attachment bolt....
I like you don't like the term preload...I use it only in classes where spring rate is non adjustable (like the scca touring classes) otherwise I'm always thinking of the spring in it's loaded condition (where it lives) not when the car is unloaded. Doing otherwise just confuses which spring /damper setup issues are really important.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #184  
Taseas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
From: ||-|| (()) ||\|| ||)) //\
Default

Since we managed to get both of you into this conversation...

May you please give us some advice about how much we can drop the ride height without messing with the RCs, having to use RCAs etc.? I Remember Robi said that 30mm is a tuning point. Using the lower edge of KW's recommended settings my car sits 35mm lower. Although it never hits the bumpstops at this height, since we clarified that raising the car will not have a negative impact on the way the spring operates should I raise it to lets say 25mm drop to be on the safe side ragarding RCs?

-of topic- BillJ, Ohlins are neither cheap or Asian and the do have a separate adjustment for preload. I understand that this is a totally different design, are there any reasons someone would like to use Ohlins instead of KW v3s? (i am referring to the DFV model which does not have separate compression/rebound adjustment, not custom versions which cost a fortune)
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #185  
WynnS123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,890
Likes: 1
From: Brandon, MS
Default

In regaurds to ride height, Billy recommended I run 3.75" - 4" measured from a level floor to the jacking points front and rear.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #186  
06S2k07Si's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 47
From: Baraboo, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Taseas,Oct 29 2009, 08:17 AM
Since we managed to get both of you into this conversation...

May you please give us some advice about how much we can drop the ride height without messing with the RCs, having to use RCAs etc.? I Remember Robi said that 30mm is a tuning point. Using the lower edge of KW's recommended settings my car sits 35mm lower. Although it never hits the bumpstops at this height, since we clarified that raising the car will not have a negative impact on the way the spring operates should I raise it to lets say 25mm drop to be on the safe side ragarding RCs?

-of topic- BillJ, Ohlins are neither cheap or Asian and the do have a separate adjustment for preload. I understand that this is a totally different design, are there any reasons someone would like to use Ohlins instead of KW v3s? (i am referring to the DFV model which does not have separate compression/rebound adjustment, not custom versions which cost a fortune)
Great question...I'm interested as well.

Thanks, Brian
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #187  
innovation's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Billj747,Oct 26 2009, 06:31 PM
After you set the suspension from those KW points, measure (ON A FLAT GROUND) from teh ground to the front and rear jack points.
so can that be a cheater way of corner balancing if u have someone in the driver seat?? just wondering... i know its not as accurate as a weight balances
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2009 | 03:11 AM
  #188  
Taseas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
From: ||-|| (()) ||\|| ||)) //\
Default

Well i don't think that was they point... anyway guys would you please chime in order to end this very interesting and valuable conversation?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #189  
m1bjr's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,445
Likes: 7
From: Plymouth
Default

Also subscribed for a good read, and Hi to my friend Taseas
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #190  
innovation's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,003
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Taseas,Oct 31 2009, 04:11 AM
Well i don't think that was they point... anyway guys would you please chime in order to end this very interesting and valuable conversation?
billyj747 advice
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 PM.