S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Quick sway bar question

Thread Tools
 
Old May 2, 2016 | 05:36 PM
  #21  
cracknut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 885
Likes: 13
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

That is a good summary by davidc1.

For road race I used to run a MX5 rear bar and an '05 front bar. However after some testing I prefer no rear bar - very smooth and predictably transition to oversteer.

Generally I want to go with small bars to keep the suspension as independent as possible.

No idea how that would fare at an AutoX. Probably not well.


Originally Posted by skatebrian624
Originally Posted by davidc1' timestamp='1461946098' post='23952339
[quote name='Kiwiflavored' timestamp='1461625535' post='23948180']
Stock rear bar, kw v3 515 f & r, square, have a Jsracing type 1 / voltex type 2.

If I can get away saving one or two hundred by going moddiction instead of karcepts more money for tires.
So, I'll give you a little background on how things changed and what I suggest your do (which you already have the stuff for).

First, here is a good link which is the definitive information about the stock S2k setups for springs, sway bars and shocks and how they changed through the years. It's a really good technical read.

https://www.s2ki.com/...ension-springs/

The S2k started off as a car that was super easy to coax into oversteer. This is why Honda put a staggered setup on the car in the first place. To try to tame the rear end a little and make it stick better in day to day driving.

As the years went buy, Honda kept tweaking the front and rear spring rates and sway bar stiffness. All the tweaks were to try to dial out the oversteer characteristics for a street vehicle and keep the staggered tire setup. By the end of the run, the S2k was far more neutral than before, but still tail happy as they say.

The ultimate expression of this was the CR, which, with the spring rates finally biased to the front instead of the rear, and with different shocks, they made it a pretty neutral handling car.

When I changed to a CR spring/shock set up, it literally transformed the handling of the car.

So, now, in order to increase the front end ultimate grip on the track, many people go with a square set up.

However, going with a square set up MASSIVELY shift the grip to the front of the car, and changes the car back into a loose oversteering car, more than ever before, albeit with more overall grip. People who do this on stock spring shock setup have made for a poor handling car.

To get the car to be more neutral in handling, you want to increase grip at the rear.

Especially in mid to high speed corners, the most effective way to to this is with a big rear wing. You've got that done. Good.

But, that big rear will doesn't help you at all in low speed corners. To do that, you must increase rear grip/decrease front grip using mechanical/non-aero methods.

You would do this by changing springs to more like CR balance (front stiffer than rear by a touch). Keep in mind, lowering the car will again slightly shift grip back to the front. You've more or less done that as well.

But, that won't make the car come anywhere close to a neutral handling car in low to mid speed corners. To do that, you have to massively stiffen up the front of the car. This is exactly why companies such as Saner, Gendron and Karcepts make these super stiff front sway bars. The stiffness needed for autocross is generally greater than needed for the track.

So, I remember doing some calculations ,and while it is oversimplified , a bar in the range of your Karcpets on the softest setting, will be about 755 lbs., which is "approx" what you would use, by calculation. How the car handles on the track is the ultimate test.

http://www.karcepts....p?id_product=81

This is why I bought a used Gendron bar myself.
Pretty much hit the nail on the head. For AP1 guys, you can also help shift grip to the rear by running a smaller rear bar in conjunction with a large front bar. I think back in the day it was common to run a Miata front bar for the rear. For autocross that will probably make your transitions feel more sluggish, but on track it will pay dividends for stability during mid-corner and corner exit throttle application. So it depends if you want to be fast on track or in an autocross. A compromise will just make you slower in both.
[/quote]
Reply
Old May 4, 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #22  
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 42
From: Windsor, CA
Default

Originally Posted by cracknut
That is a good summary by davidc1.

For road race I used to run a MX5 rear bar and an '05 front bar. However after some testing I prefer no rear bar - very smooth and predictably transition to oversteer.

Generally I want to go with small bars to keep the suspension as independent as possible.

No idea how that would fare at an AutoX. Probably not well.


Originally Posted by skatebrian624' timestamp='1461950786' post='23952449
[quote name='davidc1' timestamp='1461946098' post='23952339']
[quote name='Kiwiflavored' timestamp='1461625535' post='23948180']
Stock rear bar, kw v3 515 f & r, square, have a Jsracing type 1 / voltex type 2.

If I can get away saving one or two hundred by going moddiction instead of karcepts more money for tires.
So, I'll give you a little background on how things changed and what I suggest your do (which you already have the stuff for).

First, here is a good link which is the definitive information about the stock S2k setups for springs, sway bars and shocks and how they changed through the years. It's a really good technical read.

https://www.s2ki.com/...ension-springs/

The S2k started off as a car that was super easy to coax into oversteer. This is why Honda put a staggered setup on the car in the first place. To try to tame the rear end a little and make it stick better in day to day driving.

As the years went buy, Honda kept tweaking the front and rear spring rates and sway bar stiffness. All the tweaks were to try to dial out the oversteer characteristics for a street vehicle and keep the staggered tire setup. By the end of the run, the S2k was far more neutral than before, but still tail happy as they say.

The ultimate expression of this was the CR, which, with the spring rates finally biased to the front instead of the rear, and with different shocks, they made it a pretty neutral handling car.

When I changed to a CR spring/shock set up, it literally transformed the handling of the car.

So, now, in order to increase the front end ultimate grip on the track, many people go with a square set up.

However, going with a square set up MASSIVELY shift the grip to the front of the car, and changes the car back into a loose oversteering car, more than ever before, albeit with more overall grip. People who do this on stock spring shock setup have made for a poor handling car.

To get the car to be more neutral in handling, you want to increase grip at the rear.

Especially in mid to high speed corners, the most effective way to to this is with a big rear wing. You've got that done. Good.

But, that big rear will doesn't help you at all in low speed corners. To do that, you must increase rear grip/decrease front grip using mechanical/non-aero methods.

You would do this by changing springs to more like CR balance (front stiffer than rear by a touch). Keep in mind, lowering the car will again slightly shift grip back to the front. You've more or less done that as well.

But, that won't make the car come anywhere close to a neutral handling car in low to mid speed corners. To do that, you have to massively stiffen up the front of the car. This is exactly why companies such as Saner, Gendron and Karcepts make these super stiff front sway bars. The stiffness needed for autocross is generally greater than needed for the track.

So, I remember doing some calculations ,and while it is oversimplified , a bar in the range of your Karcpets on the softest setting, will be about 755 lbs., which is "approx" what you would use, by calculation. How the car handles on the track is the ultimate test.

http://www.karcepts....p?id_product=81

This is why I bought a used Gendron bar myself.
Pretty much hit the nail on the head. For AP1 guys, you can also help shift grip to the rear by running a smaller rear bar in conjunction with a large front bar. I think back in the day it was common to run a Miata front bar for the rear. For autocross that will probably make your transitions feel more sluggish, but on track it will pay dividends for stability during mid-corner and corner exit throttle application. So it depends if you want to be fast on track or in an autocross. A compromise will just make you slower in both.
[/quote]
[/quote]

I agree with cracknut. Never forget that sway bars reduce mechanical grip.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speedf50
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
6
Sep 9, 2015 02:14 PM
DrivenAP2
S2000 Racing and Competition
26
Jun 20, 2014 02:30 AM
Chugs
S2000 Racing and Competition
15
Sep 12, 2011 08:58 AM
superjimbo
S2000 Under The Hood
1
May 18, 2005 07:22 AM
esracer
S2000 Racing and Competition
12
Feb 8, 2005 05:00 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 PM.