Shocks for STR
Originally Posted by INTJ,Jul 11 2010, 01:54 PM
That's exactly my thought, low speed is the handling, high speed it the road defect. If anything I want the blowoff not ramp up to be able to use the berms, not send me into low-earth orbit.
[QUOTE=alvanderp,Jul 11 2010, 04:18 PM]I'll try and dig up the invoice, but I'm 99% sure its an L/VDP piston.
Are you trying to say that in your experience Penske linear rebound pistons flatten out like that at x force(defined by the shim stack) regardless of the position of the adjuster?
Are you trying to say that in your experience Penske linear rebound pistons flatten out like that at x force(defined by the shim stack) regardless of the position of the adjuster?
Originally Posted by Random1,Jul 11 2010, 10:46 PM
Yes, if the linear curve did not flatten out then that would imply an infinite force is achievable.
I did not choose the valving on my shocks -- the previous owner was adapting a very high rate linear valving for use on pavement with humps and bumps. I am not sure why he chose such a high maximum force, but it did work a lot better on irregular surfaces than the pure linear valving. And like Drew's shocks, mine were built for Stock.
My main point was that Drew probably knows what pistons are in his shocks, and it's not impossible that his F-v curve was produced by the pistons he says he has.
My main point was that Drew probably knows what pistons are in his shocks, and it's not impossible that his F-v curve was produced by the pistons he says he has.
Originally Posted by alvanderp,Jul 12 2010, 06:55 AM
Perhaps I should clarify, I can sort of see your point on my front shock because the flattening effect is somewhat progressive, but on the rears, the knee is pretty pronounced. I'd be surprised if the force termination was that pronounced on a Linear piston, but it's hard to see on your dynos because the plots stop at 5 in/sec. When it all comes down to it we are arguing semantics, I just want the shocks to do what I want 

I think your fronts will likely work for STR and worth a try before doing a re-valve.
Any plots for the rears?
Originally Posted by Random1,Jul 12 2010, 11:50 AM
I think your fronts will likely work for STR and worth a try before doing a re-valve.
Any plots for the rears?
Any plots for the rears?
The rear plots are in the same link, just scroll down
Originally Posted by alvanderp,Jul 12 2010, 01:49 PM
Yeah I ran them this weekend and they worked fine, I'd just like them to be a bit more palatable on the street.
The rear plots are in the same link, just scroll down
The rear plots are in the same link, just scroll down

The rears look they would work as well. You may need more compression over what the plot shows. The rebound does have a digressive curve for the rears.

I am surprised at how little the compression adjustment changes from full soft to full firm. It almost looks like an 8100 compression adjuster.
has anyone found a double adj. mono tube coilover set-up thats under $2500? Besides tcklines which you cant get any more.
speaking of tcklines, what model koni's are they? Could I just a set and re-valve them through koni?
speaking of tcklines, what model koni's are they? Could I just a set and re-valve them through koni?
Originally Posted by josh7owens,Aug 5 2010, 08:27 AM
has anyone found a double adj. mono tube coilover set-up thats under $2500? Besides tcklines which you cant get any more.
TC Klines are the 8242 twin tube, I believe, and the S2000 fitment was a special run made for TC Kline.
For somewhere around $3000, you can get a complete bolt-on solution with the 30-series monotube Konis through ProParts.
For somewhere around $3000, you can get a complete bolt-on solution with the 30-series monotube Konis through ProParts.




