S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Spin & Engine Won't Start

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

if that was the case tho, it would stall even if you had the clutch in the whole time would it not?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #12  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by krazik,Dec 7 2006, 12:34 PM
if that was the case tho, it would stall even if you had the clutch in the whole time would it not?
[The following is plausible (to me, as a combustion engineer) speculation, but I don't know for sure that this is reall what is happening in the S2000.]

It's probably a vapor lock type thing. When the engine is running, the flow of fuel through the injectors cools them. When the engine stops, it's still hot but now the fuel injectors are no longer being cooled. So the heat up. (This is known as "soakback".)

Now when you try and pump fuel through them, the fuel vaporizes because the fuel injectors are hot. This leads to the so-called "vapor lock", which used to be more common with carbs.

After a short time, the injectors have cooled enough that this stops happening.

I'm using the phrase "vapor lock" very losely, because it originally referred to the heat vaporizing the fuel in the fuel pump. Since our fuel pumps are in the tank rather than the engine, it's not really the same thing.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:31 AM
  #13  
Windscreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 390
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee
Default

As an engineer that does engine development for a living (one of my babies), I don't buy the vapor lock explanation. I've routinely shut down engines from rated power, full load and never had a vapor lock issue.

What seems more likely to me is one of two scenarios when in a spin and both feet are not in, resulting in reverse engine rotation:

1. Reverse rotation pumps exhaust into the intake manifold, which is incombustible. When you go to restart, the ECU provides fueling as normal, but since there is insufficient oxygen to mix with for combustion on the first few cycles, the engine gets flooded - probably getting the spark plugs wet and preventing spark.

2. Reverse rotation creates numerous encoder errors (that's what we call them) because the ECU is not programmed to recognize crankshaft rotation direction and thus the timing pattern detected is not expected. It may then take extended cranking for the ECU to clear the error and resynch.

Just my thoughts,
Steve
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #14  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Windscreen,Dec 8 2006, 07:31 AM
As an engineer that does engine development for a living (one of my babies), I don't buy the vapor lock explanation. I've routinely shut down engines from rated power, full load and never had a vapor lock issue.

What seems more likely to me is one of two scenarios when in a spin and both feet are not in, resulting in reverse engine rotation:

1. Reverse rotation pumps exhaust into the intake manifold, which is incombustible. When you go to restart, the ECU provides fueling as normal, but since there is insufficient oxygen to mix with for combustion on the first few cycles, the engine gets flooded - probably getting the spark plugs wet and preventing spark.

2. Reverse rotation creates numerous encoder errors (that's what we call them) because the ECU is not programmed to recognize crankshaft rotation direction and thus the timing pattern detected is not expected. It may then take extended cranking for the ECU to clear the error and resynch.

Just my thoughts,
Steve
Either one also sounds plausible to me. That assumes there is reverse rotation, though. I guess one test would be, if you lock down the wheels but don't use the clutch, then do you still have trouble restarting? If not, then it probably does have something to do with reverse rotation. But if you do, then reverse rotation is not a likely cause.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StormTroopinAP2
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Nov 5, 2011 03:31 PM
PanteraKitty
S2000 Racing and Competition
7
Jun 2, 2008 08:52 PM
alexpilot
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
4
Oct 23, 2007 03:45 AM
lips2000.5
Texas - Houston S2000 Owners
5
Aug 1, 2003 12:46 PM
Flayer
S2000 Talk
5
Jun 3, 2001 02:06 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM.