stang v. s2000
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Big deal, the S2000 owner cannot drive. Two weeks ago I ran a 90 5.0 LX up to125 and had him by about 3-4 cars. I saw him a week later and he said his friend has one and everytime he runs him, the same results. He complimented me on my ride and was a nice guy.
#22
well I can't beleive that the s-2000 lost cause my friend owns a 95 svt cobra and I have beat him many of times also just two days ago I raced a 5.0 and smoked him by two car lengths. aint no lie either.
#23
ummm 2 car lenghts is nothing to brag about unless you only raced to about 45mph...was the 5.0 stock?
If you beat a 95 svt cobra by 3-4 car lenghts, then you should beat a 5.0 lx by a little bit more than that...ur talking a 14 second cobra, and a 14.8 second 5.0 (although the cobra is a 5.0 as well)...
Oh and I don't believe the 95's were considered SVT...wasn't that a Mod Motor thing? 96+?
If you beat a 95 svt cobra by 3-4 car lenghts, then you should beat a 5.0 lx by a little bit more than that...ur talking a 14 second cobra, and a 14.8 second 5.0 (although the cobra is a 5.0 as well)...
Oh and I don't believe the 95's were considered SVT...wasn't that a Mod Motor thing? 96+?
#25
Originally posted by millhouse
A manual stock 5.0lx will give a s2000 a run for it's money from a dig...from a roll, you guys definatley have an advantage.
A manual stock 5.0lx will give a s2000 a run for it's money from a dig...from a roll, you guys definatley have an advantage.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post