What does it take
Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Mar 10 2006, 09:04 PM
http://forums.clubrsx.com/showthread.php?t=363937 there you go my friend, vid inside. Bottom line.. bolt on rsx with kpro > stock s2k
you guys are idiots... I have beat countless rsx's... keep dreaming that your fwd, womens cars is something special... I'd rather drive an srt-4
I'm not gonna even both and look at that stupid link... There is no way you guys can possible think the rsx is on par with the s2k on any level of performance...
I'm not gonna even both and look at that stupid link... There is no way you guys can possible think the rsx is on par with the s2k on any level of performance...
Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Mar 11 2006, 11:03 AM
you guys are idiots... I have beat countless rsx's... keep dreaming that your fwd, womens cars is something special... I'd rather drive an srt-4
Originally Posted by xman03,Mar 11 2006, 11:07 AM
hey nice comeback buddy.. you're a complete idiot.. having owned both cars i have no bias so I'm stating the facts. bolt-on rsx with kpro is definately faster than a stock s2k.. on the same note my buddy's 05 evo RS was a bit quicker than my rsx so you go figure out what it takes for an s2k to take on an evo. 05-05 type-s is faster than a stock s2k with just intake/race header/exhaust
who cares about YOUR s2k, we are talking about a stock s2k. You saw the video of a fwd 'womens car' running mid 13's. It would be quite ugly for a stock s2k especially from a roll, sorry buddy.
That mid-13 is impressive the rsx, though it was a combination of a fair amount of Weight savings, driver skill, car and conditions. All in all. I'd like to see other RSX drivers recreate that time... Cuz it would be very VERY hard.
And as for the statement
MAYBE true in a roll, but I think other wise from a dig. and I know for sure that on the TRACK... the S2 will very nicely skip away from your bolt-on RSX.
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
And as for the statement
05-05 type-s is faster than a stock s2k with just intake/race header/exhaust
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
Originally Posted by Will_ChinLee,Mar 11 2006, 12:37 PM
That mid-13 is impressive the rsx, though it was a combination of a fair amount of Weight savings, driver skill, car and conditions. All in all. I'd like to see other RSX drivers recreate that time... Cuz it would be very VERY hard.
And as for the statement
MAYBE true in a roll, but I think other wise from a dig. and I know for sure that on the TRACK... the S2 will very nicely skip away from your bolt-on RSX.
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
And as for the statement
MAYBE true in a roll, but I think other wise from a dig. and I know for sure that on the TRACK... the S2 will very nicely skip away from your bolt-on RSX.
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
Ok enough RSX-fanboi-isms for one day.
A. yes, an i/rh/e and hondata RSX is faster than an S2000 from a roll. from a dig, probably not so much.
B. rsx with just i/rh/e will be close from a roll, but the S2k is still a bit faster. from a dig, the rsx has no chance.
this thread is stupid. closed.
A. yes, an i/rh/e and hondata RSX is faster than an S2000 from a roll. from a dig, probably not so much.
B. rsx with just i/rh/e will be close from a roll, but the S2k is still a bit faster. from a dig, the rsx has no chance.
this thread is stupid. closed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



