S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

What does it take

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 09:52 AM
  #31  
xman03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott city, MD
Default

Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Mar 10 2006, 09:04 PM
wtf are u talking about

No damn rsx with any bolt on will hang with an s2k...

watch these video's of my s2k with 3mods vrs a fully bolt on and tuned rsx type-s

its murder... every time

VIDEo 1

RACE 2

you have no clue what the hell your talking about
you're retarded, rsx with similar mods ran 13.56 at the track. I went from my rsx to a stock ap1 and yes s2000 is noticibely slower. mkkk now go screw yourself
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #32  
xman03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott city, MD
Default

http://forums.clubrsx.com/showthread.php?t=363937 there you go my friend, vid inside. Bottom line.. bolt on rsx with kpro > stock s2k
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 10:03 AM
  #33  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

you guys are idiots... I have beat countless rsx's... keep dreaming that your fwd, womens cars is something special... I'd rather drive an srt-4


I'm not gonna even both and look at that stupid link... There is no way you guys can possible think the rsx is on par with the s2k on any level of performance...
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #34  
xman03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott city, MD
Default

Originally Posted by kayvan_pour,Mar 11 2006, 11:03 AM
you guys are idiots... I have beat countless rsx's... keep dreaming that your fwd, womens cars is something special... I'd rather drive an srt-4
hey nice comeback buddy.. you're a complete idiot.. having owned both cars i have no bias so I'm stating the facts. bolt-on rsx with kpro is definately faster than a stock s2k.. on the same note my buddy's 05 evo RS was a bit quicker than my rsx so you go figure out what it takes for an s2k to take on an evo. 05-05 type-s is faster than a stock s2k with just intake/race header/exhaust
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #35  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

Originally Posted by xman03,Mar 11 2006, 11:07 AM
hey nice comeback buddy.. you're a complete idiot.. having owned both cars i have no bias so I'm stating the facts. bolt-on rsx with kpro is definately faster than a stock s2k.. on the same note my buddy's 05 evo RS was a bit quicker than my rsx so you go figure out what it takes for an s2k to take on an evo. 05-05 type-s is faster than a stock s2k with just intake/race header/exhaust
yea, it was a good come back... Do you really think your gonna change my mind by your bs calculations of one car vrs another vrs 2 more guys u met online that raced some other guy that beat his cousins car... please, i have posted toooo many videos of me beating rsx's... dont waste ur time on me, it's not worth it.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #36  
xman03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott city, MD
Default

who cares about YOUR s2k, we are talking about a stock s2k. You saw the video of a fwd 'womens car' running mid 13's. It would be quite ugly for a stock s2k especially from a roll, sorry buddy.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #37  
Will_ChinLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Unhappy

That mid-13 is impressive the rsx, though it was a combination of a fair amount of Weight savings, driver skill, car and conditions. All in all. I'd like to see other RSX drivers recreate that time... Cuz it would be very VERY hard.
And as for the statement
05-05 type-s is faster than a stock s2k with just intake/race header/exhaust
MAYBE true in a roll, but I think other wise from a dig. and I know for sure that on the TRACK... the S2 will very nicely skip away from your bolt-on RSX.
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #38  
xman03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott city, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Will_ChinLee,Mar 11 2006, 12:37 PM
That mid-13 is impressive the rsx, though it was a combination of a fair amount of Weight savings, driver skill, car and conditions. All in all. I'd like to see other RSX drivers recreate that time... Cuz it would be very VERY hard.
And as for the statement

MAYBE true in a roll, but I think other wise from a dig. and I know for sure that on the TRACK... the S2 will very nicely skip away from your bolt-on RSX.
IMO the stock S2 faster, cuz any idiot can drive straight. Its the S2 overall performance that makes it so much quicker than an RSX, esp. with all your suspension gremlins
many rsx-s pulled off 13.6's with similar mods. I agree that s2k is a MUCH nicer car all around and I like my s2k much better than I ever liked my rsx but that's not this topic is really about.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #39  
Wisconsin S2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Default

Ok enough RSX-fanboi-isms for one day.

A. yes, an i/rh/e and hondata RSX is faster than an S2000 from a roll. from a dig, probably not so much.


B. rsx with just i/rh/e will be close from a roll, but the S2k is still a bit faster. from a dig, the rsx has no chance.


this thread is stupid. closed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
txs2knoah
Car and Bike Talk
4
Oct 16, 2006 10:18 AM
BS2000
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
14
Dec 20, 2005 12:14 AM
TypeR1159
S2000 Street Encounters
6
Aug 11, 2005 07:31 PM
bigfishs
S2000 Street Encounters
17
Aug 5, 2005 05:53 PM
jojipoji
S2000 Street Encounters
21
Jun 19, 2003 07:30 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 PM.