04 vs 03 Dyno test on vtec.net
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ultimate lurker
You know, I had a nice long reply trying _once again_ to politely communicate how an engine can gain power, or how testing practices differ, but you know what, it doesn't matter.
AFAIC, many of you are living in a dream world.
You know, I had a nice long reply trying _once again_ to politely communicate how an engine can gain power, or how testing practices differ, but you know what, it doesn't matter.
AFAIC, many of you are living in a dream world.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Originally posted by ITR #203
(sarcasm toward ttb and luis)
considaring how many S2000's you have tested, I should believe you right? and of those how many were the 04 F22C's?
(sarcasm toward ttb and luis)
considaring how many S2000's you have tested, I should believe you right? and of those how many were the 04 F22C's?
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ITR #203
UL has been a great member of this board and has contributed more than either of you as far as I am concerned.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Madison
I no longer doubt the numbers provided by UL.
I would appreciate your explanation of how the 04 makes the increased hp and torque that it produces. I'm still suprised that they were able to make as much power as they have. Would strenghtened materials allow the same engine to pull just as strong to a higher rev limit? What fuel mapping and timing issues were you referring to that could yield more torque down low?
I'm also eager to see your appraisal of the car in terms of real world acceleration and handling. Too bad you haven't been able to change the alignment. I had mine altered slightly, mostly adding -1.1 front camber from -.05. Car is quicker to respond, though not quite as eager to drive in a straight line.
I would appreciate your explanation of how the 04 makes the increased hp and torque that it produces. I'm still suprised that they were able to make as much power as they have. Would strenghtened materials allow the same engine to pull just as strong to a higher rev limit? What fuel mapping and timing issues were you referring to that could yield more torque down low?
I'm also eager to see your appraisal of the car in terms of real world acceleration and handling. Too bad you haven't been able to change the alignment. I had mine altered slightly, mostly adding -1.1 front camber from -.05. Car is quicker to respond, though not quite as eager to drive in a straight line.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I really like this board...really I do. However, I can't for the life of me understand why some people refuse to believe that the 04 MAY just be better in some areas (and maybe worse in others). It somehow feels like a "who's d!ck is bigger" contest. Immature, at best.
