S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

04 vs 03 Dyno test on vtec.net

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #51  
B.C.'s Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59,877
Likes: 12
From: Area 51
Default

Originally posted by SJSHARKS
If those numbers are accurate, the 2004 S2000 would be very close to NSX like performance.
Not really, those are peak numbers. The NSX is a different body, it will never perform as well as a NSX, but it's its baby brother!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 10:00 AM
  #52  
LudegarH22A7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Yup GA
Default

Originally posted by SJSHARKS
If those numbers are accurate, the 2004 S2000 would be very close to NSX like performance.

Yeah, 3.0L numbers are highly probable.. 1/4mile around 13.6 @ 105mph..???
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 10:01 AM
  #53  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

actually for the most part, the existing 00-03 s2ks can give an nsx a run for its money. 3.0 vs 2.0, stock for stock.

I'm not talking about just in a straight line either.


IMO of course.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #54  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

You gotta remember that the NSX engines were underrated too - by about 15-20 hp on the 3.2 liter motors. No way an 04 S2K is getting into the 12's near 110 mph (as some stock 3.2 NSX's have).

UL
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 10:37 AM
  #55  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

The 3.2 litres are a beast, I wouldn't see it happening. I've run against an automatic 3.0 litre NSX and won, but even that was an extremely close race.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 10:51 AM
  #56  
SJSHARKS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: STOCKTON
Default

The NSX web site has dyno numbers on the earlier NSX's in the 230-240 range.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 11:07 AM
  #57  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Two cars does not make it a reality. We have seen different pre 04's dyno 10-20hp from one another on a given day. Regardless, I'll wait until someone with a real dyno does a comparison.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #58  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

http://forums.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.p...934#post2493934

Many of the same points covered in the above.

My thinking about "underrated":

1) It is not about insurance (
2) If the #'s are true, then 266/2.2 = 120.9/liter, so much for that whining.
3) If true, where are the perf numbers benefits in the preliminary mag tests?- they do not seem to show the benefits - are the engines too green, or have they not done true instrumentation tests?
4) Dynos can vary car to car, test conditions to test conditions, dyno to dyno
5) Ron Bauer and Banannie have real-world comments that performance is up - period. Even with less than optimum tires and alignment settings - hard to argue about that.
6) The NSX posts high 13's, 5.0 to 60 (at least my 1995 NSX-T did with the 3.0 engine - not sure about later 3.2l cars, but where has an S2K come close to that without FI?
7) What does the NSX's body have to do with acceleration numbers? In handling, the S2K and the nsx are close - I Owned an NSX, and am close to owning an S2K, but have lots of seat time in several 01-02's.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #59  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

Originally posted by asu_lee
I am waiting for a brillant response from secret AP1.
Now now, be magnanimous A_L - Secret has made some points of merit, although not the most benevolent in tone.

The "truth" about the MY04 is coming out, and most of the gloom and doom is being exposed for what is was - sour grapes and resistance to change. That is a two-sided coin - example? I will be replacing the RE050's at 3 years, worn or not, with a dry-optimized pair od shoes like Kumho Extsa's, or Michelin Pilots, etc. Or Pirellia PZero Rosso Asimmetrico's.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2003 | 12:21 PM
  #60  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ultimate lurker
The car does make more power, period.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.