S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2.2L Engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #111  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler,Jan 27 2005, 06:40 PM
If you look at my dyno chart, it appears that Honda isn't telling the whole story... the power does indeed come on 500 or so RPMs sooner, but it also continues, my car made peak power exactly at redline
From what I've read on this forum through the years, Honda has been tweaking the fuel ratios and ignition timing for each year model. If I'm getting it right, the originals power band dropped off significantly after peak power at 8300 rpm because the ECU richened up the mixture. This was allegedly done to protect the engine. Later models tended to do a little better because Honda programmed the system to maintain a more power efficient fuel mix between peak power rpms and redline. The MY04's + are simply a continuation of that evolution.

Just a thought......

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 12:02 AM
  #112  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

Originally Posted by Warren J. Dew' date='Jan 27 2005, 09:57 PM
Do you know if the '02 was tweaked in any way? The mid range does not show the sag in torque around 5000 rpm that I've seen on other dyno charts. If you shift the lines using percentage of maximum rpm as the horizontal axis (so that both redline at the right end of the graph), the two power lines will lie almost on top of one another except at the very top end - without the difference in the mid range that is supposed to be the main difference between the engines. I wonder what's going on there.
The 02 was bone stock.

No, you're actually incorrect about the shifting the lines, too. Look at the post VTEC power, not only does the 04 make more power, but it is more accessible. first gear goes by too quick but I'd expect that if we lined up these cars in second that the 04 would pull away pretty hard.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 08:36 PM
  #113  
kmvguy83's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 526
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default

OK, I found an interesting article about piston speed for 04
according to this article
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?se...article_id=7274

03's piston speed = 4906 feet per minute @ 8900 rpm
04's piston speed = 4761 feet per minute @ 8000 rpm

so in calculation
04 piston speed @ 9000 = ~5356 feet per minute
04 will have same piston speed as 03 when rpm is ~8244 rpm
04 @ 8500 rpm = ~5059 feet per minute

in conclusion 04 piston speed actually increased rather than decrease.
i dont think 04 engine w/ 9k redline will be so safe.

btw how's the project going?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #114  
betawax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

interesting posts!
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #115  
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Somerville, MA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by kitwetzler' date='Jan 28 2005, 01:02 AM
The 02 was bone stock.

No, you're actually incorrect about the shifting the lines, too. Look at the post VTEC power, not only does the 04 make more power, but it is more accessible. first gear goes by too quick but I'd expect that if we lined up these cars in second that the 04 would pull away pretty hard.
Thanks for the info on the '02. The dyno curve at the link earlier in the thread shows a much weaker mid range for the pre-'04, which is why I wondered if there was a difference.

Regarding the lines, I did say "except at the very top", right? The '05 at 7200 is about 200 horsepower on that graph, about the same as the '02 at 8000 rpm; in both cases that's about 10% below red line. It's only in that last 10% that the '05 makes more power while the '02's power flattens out then falls.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 12:11 PM
  #116  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

^ that would be relevant if the cars were geared to redline at the same speed. In fact, the 04/05 reaches the power earlier due to shorter gearing, which means it'll accelerate a lot quicker.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #117  
Billman250's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,384
Likes: 1,834
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Car is running well stay tuned fellas
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #118  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Can't wait to see what the outcome is.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #119  
Promeds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Default

If USDM 04-05 rev to 8K how can JDM 04-05 rev to 9K, I don't understand.

Asghar.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #120  
S2kRob's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Hmmm,

I am very interested in seeing how this pans out. UL posted about buying a 2.2l short block for under 3k. That could be a sweet project, a 2.2l with an F20C head.

But I wouldn't do it if the redline dropped from 9k rpm.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:15 AM.