S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2000 ap1 a classic now?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 01:42 PM
  #41  
hammerhead300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Omaha NE
Default

Unless you find a sucker the right person, you can't expect to get KBB value out of a car. Having that low of mileage for its age would make a huge difference, but like everybody else said, even if you don't drive it much, there will come a time that you'll regret getting rid of it if you do. Unless you really need the money, definitely hang on to it.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2013 | 09:50 AM
  #42  
NickGDB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

The S2k is definitely a future classic. I expect prices to get pretty ridiculous 20 years from now for a mint stocker.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2013 | 01:29 AM
  #43  
05thumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NickGDB
The S2k is definitely a future classic. I expect prices to get pretty ridiculous 20 years from now for a mint stocker.
Hmmm, not so sure. Prices won't drop much but reality is simply reality.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2013 | 06:31 AM
  #44  
jimmy-buffett's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by preludepatrick
NADA undervalues unusually low mileage, KBB overvalues it. Somewhere in the middle is usually right.
This is why you should do an average of KBB, NADA and Edmunds for the three pricing categories: Trade-In, Private Party and Dealer Retail. I've done this for every car that I've sold private-party and it cuts down on the haggling because the other person knows that they're getting a fair deal.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2013 | 10:42 AM
  #45  
g0g3tt4's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 2
From: Nor Cal (Humboldt, Ca)
Default

So far I've (heard on this thread) read that a classic car is more of a classic based on miles. That would be a no. It might be more valued but it won't make it more of a classic, either it is or it ain't.
It's a classic based on supply and demand? Err, no. The retro styled Challenger was selling for 10k over cost for a while from dealers... it ain't no classic. Classic cars can't be decided by a demand curve alone.
Example. The "57 Chevy" is a known classic, so much so, people don't call it a Bel Air although it is. The 52 Bel Air not, as well known, is also a "classic".
I think it should be understood that the use of the word CLASSIC can be arbitrary and used loosely, and that trying to tie it down to one factor is near impossible. Age is the most clear cut category and even that gets muddled, and did so on this thread (20 vs 25 years).

I love the S2000. I think it has all the things to make it a classic. A cult like following, good looks, great mechanics, durability, and history. I keep hearing this "not many stock examples around". In the end it won't matter, a high number of number matching cars haven't remained "stock" through out their lives. We see plenty of examples of great high dollar cars rolling around and up for auction bringing a price, yes it's true that "stock cars" bring higher values, but just like all things change so will the kind of cars that we look for as time moves forward. Time will tell.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jongoz
Want to Buy
3
Jul 14, 2017 06:29 AM
sidot3291
New England S2000 Owners
5
Jul 21, 2010 09:30 AM
rosica
Delaware Valley S2000 Members
9
Dec 18, 2008 11:25 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.