S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2004 Model Announcement

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 11:47 AM
  #51  
Carlson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Default

This thread reminds me of the one back in May, 2001, when some guy said that there would be a glass rear window for the '02. At that time, everybody insulted him like he was a real idiot. Everybody laughed at him, saying that the only glass rear window for the S2000 would be on the hardtop. I believed him and waited for the '02. Now I got a glass window and I don't have a hardtop.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 11:56 AM
  #52  
KeithD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 0
From: WASTED in Margaritaville
Default

I concur with the others that have said this. The S will go away in a year or two and there will be a reborn Prelude or CRX to take its place.

I don't think a radical redesign off a low-production sportscar is a very financially sound decision. I would guess the profitability on the S is probably the least of any car in the Honda lineup exclusive of the NSX, which they preportedly lose money on every single one produced.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 11:58 AM
  #53  
NJTom2000's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 871
Likes: 7
From: Williamson County TN
Default

Actually I looked up some of those posts. And this guy may have been one of the first to claim to have knowledge of the glass rear window.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:00 PM
  #54  
Larry's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Westerville
Default

Hasn't Honda discontinued every other S version vehicle after limited production runs with no immediate replacement? Why not the S2000?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:17 PM
  #55  
PlasticTHUG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Default

Originally posted by Thoe99
The owners are in denial, if this rumor is true.
It's a rumor... that's all it is... they aren't in denial... so blah.... whatever happens happens... I wish this guy never posted this in the first place.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:32 PM
  #56  
Rick Hesel's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,049
Likes: 1
From: Timonium
Default

If this is true, it's great news. To keep getting better, the car has to evolve and change. A new design is not necessarily a bad design -- it just depends on the design. I don't think anyone who liked XK-140s complained when Jaguar unveiled the E-Type. Both were classics in their time, and are today.

Can the S2000 be improved? Sure. Will that change in anyway the passion I have for this car? Never!
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:33 PM
  #57  
rossmon1's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 560
Likes: 12
From: San Rafael
Default

subscribed
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #58  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

Originally posted by SECRET AP1


I don't see how depreciation is a joke. Of course everyone pays for gas, maintenence, insurance, and interest (if you have a loan). Right now S2000 owners are benefitting from very little depreciation. An S2000 in good condition still goes for mid to high 20s. The point is to maintain the least amount of depreciation as possible. No where did I mention getting my money back on my car. Please, lets not insult people's intelligence by overstating the obvious... what kind of a remark is "if you want an investment buy real estate"?
it is the point of what i posted. buying a car for depreciation means you want to try and get some of your money back. My point is, is that it isn't worth much to have a car with good depreciation. The extra few thousand you are gonna get back when you sell it, is in no way going to cover what you spent on it. When you add it up you will spend probably $4000-6000 a year on the car above the car payments. No amount of savings on depreciation is ever gonna make up for this.

So if honda brings out a better car and I lose a couple thousand on depreciation..oh well. I am realy losing a tiny amount of what i'm actually paying for the car. It really seems like a non-issue to me. Now if you are one to sell a car every year or so...maybe it means more to you, but if you plan on keeping the car for a while...it is going to make no/little difference in the long run.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 12:46 PM
  #59  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by KeithD
[B]I concur with the others that have said this.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2002 | 01:06 PM
  #60  
Hamada's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: arcadia
Default

denial....true I hoped my s2000 would take after the NSX last for a decade. I dont have the cash to be buying a new model every 5 years.

why change its perfect! I love my car...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.