S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Baseline Dyno Run For AP2

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #11  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

Thats it!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #12  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

Here is the link to the dyno sheet..........

FOR ALL THE HATERS, SEE MY DYNO SHEET
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #13  
visser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax
Default

Originally Posted by silverstonejedi,Aug 22 2007, 02:28 PM
Sorry for lacking the dyno info...It was done @ Autowave in HB, CA.
Dyno-Dynamics
[QUOTE]

I just had my car tuned on a dyno dynamics and the tuner said they run under other dynos and his runs around 7% less than others, which he said is actually a conservative number; the difference is sometimes greater. He has based this on direct comparisons of cars tested on other dynos that he ran on his as well.

Is it possible your mods gave you even more gains than you expected, relative to dyno jet results? And there could be reasons outside of just the mods that contributed to your higher numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #14  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

I was only expecting around 210, but I have been to the dyno many times with my previous GSR and have been on many dynoes...Church's Dynapack, Import builders dyno jet, Autolink's dyno.....I basically did a baseline to see where I'm lacking. There is a big dip in the chart if you notice.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #15  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by jimknapp,Aug 22 2007, 01:46 PM
BTW your numbers sound about right for the 2.2 liter motor. I've gotten 251hp and 180 ft lbs. of torque at the rear tires but have a more efficient drive train in my race car than in a stock S2000.
Efficient is right, since you're putting more power to the wheels than the engine is rated for at the crank. Obviously, you have something more under the hood than the stock setup.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #16  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

I had the same setup on my AP1, but this S feels considerably faster.
The tranny, power...etc...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #17  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

Seriously...That is what I said....I am not new to Hondas and the power certain applications make.....However, these ARE the only mods I have....
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #18  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

Maybe this explains why I can hang if not inch with a stock MR on the freeway..Same result with an RS evo....Off the line is a diff story though...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #19  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

Sorry about the typos. I get excited when I type about my S.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #20  
silverstonejedi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

It was rather hot outside and if you look at the graph, the power wanted to keep going. Damn 8k redline!!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:20 PM.