S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Baseline Dyno Run For AP2

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #31  
MULDER's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,936
Likes: 12
From: Charleston
Default

Check the SoCal region at the bottom of the main forum list.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #32  
FISH22's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,275
Likes: 12
From: Virgnia
Default

Originally Posted by silverstonejedi,Aug 22 2007, 04:38 PM
Nobody. I guess I am just excited. But you clearly represent someone who spends there whole life on here slapping wrists. Infact, who the He@@ are you? Why are we so bitter? I wonder if you would be so smart with me if we were in person. People like you make me laugh...Let's stop the childish criticism and behavior.
ban.

Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #33  
thesilverbullet's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 1
From: DeepSouth
Default

nice pull.

did you do a dyno on stock trim? were there any other cars on the dyno before or after you? what were they and what were they putting down?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:54 PM
  #34  
KstreetDC's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
Default

I think the dyno is off. I recently dynoed my AP2 (mods at time of dyno: Invidia TP and ASM 60 mm SS single) and put down 206.9 whp and 138.8 ft/lbs of torque. I have been told my numbers are among the highest seen on any AP2 with similar mods dynoed on a Dyno-Dynamics Dyno.

-Will
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #35  
NA20's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=silverstonejedi,Aug 22 2007, 11:23 AM] Just baselined my AP2.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #36  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

good numbers, but it does sound like the dyno is a bit uncalibrated. i bet your realistcally around 210-215whp. strong car still.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #37  
NA20's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=versionJDM,Aug 23 2007, 09:49 AM] good numbers, but it does sound like the dyno is a bit uncalibrated.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #38  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

I thought dyno dynamics are the dynos with the wheels unbolted so they hook straight up to the hub?

If so, then that reading is about correct as they read HIGHER then the standard dynojet.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #39  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

ill need to see some traps speeds before i accept 225whp with TP and V2(which isnt that great of and intake).

i put 227whp/147wtq on a mustang, and trapped at 105-106. if hes making 225 on a DD, then hes make almost 240whp dynojet and should crank out 107 traps all day. strap him to a mustang, hes make 215whp give or take a few. still a STRONG car, but untill i see some stupid high traps, i continue to think that that dyno is very friendly.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #40  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Aug 23 2007, 10:56 AM
I thought dyno dynamics are the dynos with the wheels unbolted so they hook straight up to the hub?

If so, then that reading is about correct as they read HIGHER then the standard dynojet.
na, DD are roller dynos like mustangs/dynojets.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 PM.