S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

car stability at high speeds

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #21  
Mr. Eryozgatliyan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by 3ngin33r1,Dec 19 2005, 02:29 PM
And yes, that little flap of plastic makes a huge difference at high speeds.
a positive impact or negative? I am interested cuz I still have these on... and if taking them off will increase handling count me in!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #22  
kuyabil's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Clermont, Florida
Default

okay, i got my wheels rebalanced today. the car wasnt bouncy at 70ish as before, i will try another high speed run probably tommorow or so. ill update you guys. if still the same, ill probably get new schocks and coils.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #23  
Popeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 21,530
Likes: 17
From: Gleening the apex
Default

Originally Posted by PilotSi,Dec 19 2005, 09:53 AM
The S2k has a shorter wheelbase then other cars, which at high speeds will be less stable aerodynamically then other cars that have a longer wheelbase.
So a Caprice wagon would be more stable?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #24  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

Originally Posted by ssmr2t,Dec 19 2005, 02:41 PM
a positive impact or negative? I am interested cuz I still have these on... and if taking them off will increase handling count me in!
Positive.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #25  
NFRS2K3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Default

I would have to agree that this car does feel a bit shady in the rear at high speeds. I am also on stock suspension but I was hoping to eliminate this feeling by going with a set of Koni Yellows all around. Something with a little bit more damping seems like it would do the trick. I guess will see once I get them.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #26  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

Just drop it an inch and a half.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #27  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

The wheel "flaps" divert air around the front wheels, reducing front end drag slightly.

The S2000 is an aerodynamic dud. (By modern standards). There is no getting around that. But to obtain the proportions necessary for a vehical to look this good...its a small trade-off. One look at the highly angled windscreen and you know that it's not meant for a top speed run. The drag coefficient isn't exactly spectacular, and the car doesnt generate an ounce of downforce.

The rear end has significant lift at high speeds. (I consider any lift considerable lift). This can contribute to that uneasy "floating" feeling at speed.

I did an aerodynamic study of the general S2000 shape over the summer. There is a thread on here somehwere...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #28  
kuyabil's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Clermont, Florida
Default

thats exactly the term i was looking for, a floating feeling. any opinions from our folks who lowered their cars?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #29  
Empedocles99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: Redwood City, Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Is a wing going to create enough downforce to counteract this? Or are most of them just for looks for our car?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #30  
kuyabil's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Clermont, Florida
Default

i could also use the answer to this
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 PM.