S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Did 8k kill the S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 02:28 AM
  #111  
BirdShot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Default

AP1 vs AP2 was one of the toughest decisions I had to make in 2011

I went with the AP1 pretty much because the '03 I found was too nice to pass up. I could have just as easily gone with the AP2.

For me it was all about autocross and the 9000rpm and high second gear top speed are really nice, but that extra AP2 pull out of the corners would have worked just fine with me. They are both awesome cars.
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 07:04 AM
  #112  
kaissi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Coto De Caza
Default

Originally Posted by 30r Dreams
Originally Posted by AP1Driver' timestamp='1323489494' post='21225692
I agree to an extent. 8k kept me from buying an AP2, plus all the other "American" changes that were made to it. Everyone has a right to their opinion, and mine is that
the AP2 is inferior to the AP1 and, well.... Fails. AP1 FTW. The AP2 is just another decent performing roadster, nothing special like it was when it was first released.
Responses like this just make me shake my head. Many people who say this have either never driven an AP2, can't afford one, or both. I've owned both an AP1 and AP2, and while in bone stock form AP1's are more exciting, once modded (especially with nice suspension and forced induction) AP2's are better. The F22 makes more power, AP2 transmission shifts MUCH smoother, and the interior is refined. Not to mention the updated headlights and tails which make the car look more up to date (will admit AP1 rear bumper looks much better). I really enjoyed my AP1, but I'd be lying if I said I would take it over my AP2. To say the AP2 fails in comparison and is nothing special is just flat out ignorant though.
What about AP2 refined interior, gearbox carbon syncros, Ap2 headlights, AP2 taillights, etc... yet AP1 chassis and engine
well that's what the 2004+ european S2000 are
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 07:09 AM
  #113  
kaissi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Coto De Caza
Default

Still noone answered my questions:
And I hope noone get me wrong: I had 2007 AP2 and now 2004 Euro AP1
so I don't want to be biased to which one is better. though can someone answers those 2 questions for me:

1 - Why did they keep AP1 in Europe, and yet they made the Limited edition White S2000 to celebrate the last year of production.'
2 - Why didn't they keep 9k with 2.2? Is it reliability?
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #114  
xredjar's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

Originally Posted by kaissi
Still noone answered my questions:
And I hope noone get me wrong: I had 2007 AP2 and now 2004 Euro AP1
so I don't want to be biased to which one is better. though can someone answers those 2 questions for me:

1 - Why did they keep AP1 in Europe, and yet they made the Limited edition White S2000 to celebrate the last year of production.'
2 - Why didn't they keep 9k with 2.2? Is it reliability?

1. I believe there are taxes or other fees that increase the larger size engine you have.

2. They had to add stroke to the motor to get from 2.0 to 2.2. The longer stroke requires a lower redline.
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #115  
FluKy15's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14,697
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by xredjar
Originally Posted by kaissi' timestamp='1323533384' post='21226398
Still noone answered my questions:
And I hope noone get me wrong: I had 2007 AP2 and now 2004 Euro AP1
so I don't want to be biased to which one is better. though can someone answers those 2 questions for me:

1 - Why did they keep AP1 in Europe, and yet they made the Limited edition White S2000 to celebrate the last year of production.'
2 - Why didn't they keep 9k with 2.2? Is it reliability?

1. I believe there are taxes or other fees that increase the larger size engine you have.

2. They had to add stroke to the motor to get from 2.0 to 2.2. The longer stroke requires a lower redline.
They are taxed in Europe for having an engine displacement bigger than 2.0L. The 350z as said somewhere recently, is TWICE the price of the s2000 just for this reason.
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 01:06 PM
  #116  
clio's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 27
Default

True, but here in Australia we kept the 2 litre variant until 2009-ish and we have no such displacement style taxes
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 05:50 PM
  #117  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,961
Likes: 442
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default

Originally Posted by clio
True, but here in Australia we kept the 2 litre variant until 2009-ish and we have no such displacement style taxes
Prob because you drive on the wrong side of the road. Like the british and japanese who get taxed.
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 04:00 AM
  #118  
JackS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 3
Default

In some countrys, cars become the next MY on the first day of the year .i.e- an '08 will be registered as an '09 if sold after Jan 1.
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #119  
MAD828's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Default

In Australia we had 9k rpm the whole time and sales still declined anyway.
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 02:50 AM
  #120  
AutoUnionAG's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

The economy as been going downhill since late 07/08... Most people aren't willing to spend 35k for half a car anymore...


Simple as that... If they were still profitable, they would still be on sale..



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM.