S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

DRIVE BY WIRE

Thread Tools
 
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #21  
deuce06tsx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

IN people's names on the left they say PPD Average. What is that?
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #22  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

Post Per Day
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #23  
Nate4635's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Anything "By wire" means that specific control gets its inputs through a wire. There are many aircraft that are going that way. Using wires, instead of a mechanical, hydraulic or pneumatic link to the controls.

Drive by wire is just kinda the term thats been used in the auto industry, but is not literally Drive by wire. Drive by wire would be something to the effect of a joystick/buttons that control every aspect of controlling the car.




Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #24  
Destro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 3ngin33r1,May 1 2008, 07:18 PM
Toyotas that can park themselves (mostly) are DbW.
No, Toyotas that can park themselves are not mostly DbW. If you've ever watched a Lexus parking itself, the steering wheel still turns (see below). There is still a mechanical link between the wheel and the steering rack.

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/clips/lexus-sel...view-196551.php
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #25  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

[QUOTE=Destro,May 2 2008, 11:06 AM]No, Toyotas that can park themselves are not mostly DbW.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #26  
themike's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

AND DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS SUCK!!!!!
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #27  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

huh?
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #28  
Nate4635's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 3ngin33r1,May 2 2008, 11:14 AM
You misunderstood what I was saying or maybe I did not state it clearly enough.

When a Toyota is parking itself, it IS DbW. It does not matter what the steering wheel is doing while it's doing it, it could do the Waltz and it makes no difference, it's still DbW when parking.

Unless this guy pops out when you auto park it, it is parking itself by wire:


And I did not mean that it was mostly DbW, I meant it mostly parks itself.
I really dont think thats correct.
While sensors and computers are driving the vehicle to that spot, I dont think that the car driving itself qualifies as DBW. Just like cruise control is not drive by wire.

MAYBE park by wire


I think that the term DBW is really interpreted differently, and its actual definition varies when applied to aircraft, cars, boats, whatever.

However, no matter what platform we are talking about DBW typically mean REPLACING the mechanical link between the driver and throttle/brake/steering wheel/rudder/etc. Its not just automatically controlling something that is otherwise mechanical.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #29  
3ngin33r1's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 2
From: Kingston, WA
Default

Then why have an accelerator that simulates the "feel" of being mechanical when it's really not?

Just for tactile feedback to the driver to make them feel like they are actually mashing it down and yanking that throttle plate open?

Would that tactile feedback not be the same thing as the toyota steering wheel turning when a computer takes control?

Might as well have a PS3 controller in there

If I were a marketing genius, I'd call it an emergency recovery system in the unlikely event that the DbW system fails.

Of course, we're probably rapidly approaching the "pointless debate" pits of despair...

Probably what it will all boil down to is that it's not properly defined well enough or even implemented broadly enough to say that anything street legal is really DbW yet, maybe in 10 years.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #30  
Nate4635's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

I know there was some mercedes and im sure a handful of other concept vehicles out there that were DBW (in all aspects).

It would be pretty wild to all of a sudden say "this years S2000 is DBW, so instead of a gas pedal, you will have a throttle control lever on the steering wheel that acts as the accelerator". MUCH easier to make the standard gas pedal feel like a standard one with springs and whatnot as to change the way we have been driving cars for years.

Thinking into this a little more, I'm guessing a major hold up of true DBW systems is that it would not make sense to have the controls as we know them. It would be easier to have a joystick or a PS3 controller work our cars... However I would imagine that would affect the billions of people that currently drive, and have to educate and license ALL those people that grew up on the old system.

Even in aircraft (where each pilot is trained extensively in the exact aircraft he flies) they try to retain the way the controls feel and operate, just imagine in a car...where someone who may not have had a road test in 40 years get handed a controller!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM.