S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Dyno with Invidia, Berk TP, K&N Filter

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #31  
S2kracka's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Default

Dyno Dynamics read the lowest of the 4 types; that is the popular style of dyno here in Minnesota.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #32  
neveronlines2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Jan 11 2007, 03:25 PM
I agree



What people don't seem to realize (or maybe they do?) is that a dyno number posted by someone means nothing. Every dyno is calibrated different thus making essentially every dyno number in the world useless for comparison. The only way to get into a pissing contest about dyno numbers is if both cars were dynoed on the same dyno.
And under the same or close to conditions (temps and etc...)

The guy's over at Autowave are all good peeps with lots of experience around Hondas and acuras
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #33  
OCMusicJunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Jan 11 2007, 03:25 PM
I agree



What people don't seem to realize (or maybe they do?) is that a dyno number posted by someone means nothing. Every dyno is calibrated different thus making essentially every dyno number in the world useless for comparison. The only way to get into a pissing contest about dyno numbers is if both cars were dynoed on the same dyno.
I don't think it means [/B]nothing[B]. Another AP2 dynoed yesterday at 217 on the same dyno at the same shop, probably during a cooler part of the day. Given that is still high, but it gives a good idea that I wasn't at 230 on the dyno stock.

Still, I never claimed that my results mean anything. I wish that I'd done a baseline before starting my modding, but I didn't think about it until after my Invidia was on... at that point, my stock system was already sold. At least now I have a point of reference for future dynos, as well as against the many other S2000s that use Autowave for their tests. Just my $.02

BTW, for the other questions... yes, I have the 70mm V3 Invidia. No, I don't have tuning or any mods not in my sig.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #34  
viets2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: garland, tx
Default

[QUOTE=OCMusicJunkie,Jan 11 2007, 06:51 PM] I don't think it means [/B]nothing[B]. Another AP2 dynoed yesterday at 217 on the same dyno at the same shop, probably during a cooler part of the day. Given that is still high, but it gives a good idea that I wasn't at 230 on the dyno stock.

Still, I never claimed that my results mean anything. I wish that I'd done a baseline before starting my modding, but I didn't think about it until after my Invidia was on... at that point, my stock system was already sold. At least now I have a point of reference for future dynos, as well as against the many other S2000s that use Autowave for their tests. Just my $.02

BTW, for the other questions... yes, I have the 70mm V3 Invidia. No, I don't have tuning or any mods not in my sig.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #35  
freshs2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
From: No va
Default

i have the exact same mods! 233 whp is alot though. i don't even think my cars close to that. my goal is 220whp 225whp with my vafcII installed and tuned. i will get a dyno sheet up asap.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #36  
viets2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: garland, tx
Default

Originally Posted by freshs2k,Jan 11 2007, 09:39 PM
i have the exact same mods! 233 whp is alot though. i don't even think my cars close to that. my goal is 220whp 225whp with my vafcII installed and tuned. i will get a dyno sheet up asap.
That's sounded about right.
My goal is to get around 220-225whp too. But so far it only pushing 210whp with the a/f ratio way off(too dangerous ). And so i had to settle less than 210whp to get my a/f ratio right. I think that my header manifold is leaking when i installed the Rick's header by using the old gasket and so i guess i will be replace the header mani gasket and will see from there.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:26 PM
  #37  
06gpws2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

is it possible that the 06-07's(drive by wire) dyno higher then the 04-05 ap2s
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #38  
OCMusicJunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by 06gpws2k,Jan 11 2007, 11:26 PM
is it possible that the 06-07's(drive by wire) dyno higher then the 04-05 ap2s
I don't see why they would. DBW only controls throttle, brake, ect. Engine management should be the same.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #39  
alex7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

As stated, here is my dynograph from Autowave, stock 07

Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #40  
06gpws2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

alright i wasnt sure if the ecu or any of the tuning would be different.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.