dude, we both drive yellow S2k's and both our screen names are the same. how weird.

oh yeah, and the link doesnt work

 

I am with you bro... I would love to someday SC or turbo this thing, but if I could get to 230rwhp NA and only spend medium cheese, I would be plenty content.

When I hit 30 yrs of age, the M's and Carrera's come to mind, assuming no wifey or kiddies infringe on my plans...

 

 

And if I had tits I would never leave the house.

 

http://roadconetuning.com/Videos/HondaTech...eenvilleCew.wmv

 

that last link that SioPao worked for me, so let me know if it works for you guys too, sorry the other links didn't work. give it a try and let me know if it works or not, if not i will repost the link. hopefully it will tho. i don't see how you're gonna get 230 whp from just i/h/e personally, but whoever is doing that congrats.

 

I gotta agree....Has anybody been able to do that? What bolt-ons did they/would they have to have in order to do that.

 

219rwhp on a stock 2004 S2000, on a Dynojet. 209.5rwhp when normalized/corrected for temperature, pressure and humidity.

 

yeah i woulda definately made higher numbers than 207 if it wasn't for the major humidity and heat, but 219 whp stock? that's hard to believe the drive train only loses that much hp that's what only 12% loss? please post the graph of that

 

That's 219 uncorrected. It was a cold, foggy day, at sea level. The engine loves those conditions. So it's not a matter of less drive train loss--it's a matter of the engine putting out more power when it's cool, wet and sea level.

That's why the only meaningful comparison is a "corrected" number, showing the dyno normalized for temperature, pressure and humidity.

209.5 corrected is an entirely normal corrected number for an AP2. Uncorrected numbers are largely meaningless.