dyno'd today

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 25, 2006 | 11:31 AM

#51

SeeYouAt9K

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 234

Likes: 0

cool, did my vid i posted of the dyno run and charleston meet work for everyone?

Jan 25, 2006 | 01:24 PM

#52

Race Miata

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 815

Likes: 0

From: Vancouver

Do I see a 14.7 air/fuel ratio all across the RPM band here?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1fastminivan,Jan 25 2006, 11:39 AM

Jan 25, 2006 | 02:10 PM

#53

vbb

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 2,499

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1fastminivan,Jan 25 2006, 03:39 PM

ok, here is my dyno vid, but I hope someone can catch the correction stuff on my dynos. I don't know if mine was corrected or not but judging from my numbers they seem high for just intake and exhuast?? Here is the vid and dyno sheet

Velocity Dyno

And here is the dyno chart, in two pieces, it was printed in two pieces

I dynoed stock 201whp on this same dyno but on my first s2000 MY01 so I don't know.

I just want to know if my numbers are "corrected"?? Like everyone was stating above etc etc, any input/help would be greatly appreciated

They used the "Standard" correction factor (you see that STD Smoothing in the upper right hand corner? That's it!). STD is one correction factor, and it usually yields higher numbers than the more popular SAE correction factor (but still lower than no correction at all). I've heard argument backed up by some data that suggests STD is actually more accurate than SAE for those that are living at sea level. But most numbers you see posted are done with the SAE correction.

As just a guess, you probably put down around 5whp less if it had been the SAE smoothing/correction factor, but that's just a ballpark figure.

Good numbers either way!